2008
DOI: 10.2341/07-141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Tooth Preparation Cleansing Protocols on the Bond Strength of Self-adhesive Resin Luting Cement to Contaminated Dentin

Abstract: SUMMARYThis in vitro study evaluated the bond strength of a self-adhesive luting cement after using four different techniques to remove surface contamination on dentin. Extracted human molars were flattened to expose the dentin surface and prepared for full crown preparation. Acrylic temporary crowns were fabricated and placed using temporary cement. The specimens were stored at room temperature with 100% relative humidity for seven days. Following removal of the temporary crowns, the specimens were randomly d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

6
38
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Specimens abraded with aluminum oxide showed the highest shear bond strength values compared with any other cleansing technique. This result is consistent with a previous study 21 showing significantly higher bond strength when aluminum oxide particles were used for dentin surface treatment before indirect restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive resin luting cement, compared with pumice and hand instruments. In their study, tooth surfaces were treated with 50 and 27 lm aluminum oxide particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Specimens abraded with aluminum oxide showed the highest shear bond strength values compared with any other cleansing technique. This result is consistent with a previous study 21 showing significantly higher bond strength when aluminum oxide particles were used for dentin surface treatment before indirect restorations were cemented with a self-adhesive resin luting cement, compared with pumice and hand instruments. In their study, tooth surfaces were treated with 50 and 27 lm aluminum oxide particles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to the information available on selfadhesive cement, the presence of water, phosphoric acid, and methacrylate monomer will demineralize the smear layer and the underlying dentin, while simultaneously infiltrating the porous dentin surface, as a result of its hydrophilic properties and the neutralization of acid that occurs as polymerization progresses 21 ; however, insufficient demineralization and limited resin infiltration have been observed. 5,14,18,31 In the present study, 40% polyacrylic acid was used to verify whether this weak acid would provide further demineralization to enhance bonding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonding of self-etch adhesives/resin cements is compromised when they are applied to oil-contaminated or temporary cement-contaminated dentin (20,21). From a practical perspective, excess unset sealers that are present around filled canal orifices are smeared over the pulp chamber dentin during the application of self-etching adhesives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Recently, the use of a low-pressure aluminum oxide particle abrasion has been reported as an effective mechanical cleansing surface treatment in removing residual provisional luting agents. 14 The microparticle abrasion technique has been described as an alternative method of tooth structure pretreatment that minimizes the vibration, pressure and heat associated with rotary cutting instruments. Kinetic energy, generated by a high-velocity stream of aluminum oxide particles, is used to prepare dentin and enamel, while having only a slight impact on softer materials, such as gingival tissue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%