The Effects of Tobacco Coverage in the Public Communication Environment on Young People’s Decisions to Smoke Combustible Cigarettes

Abstract

In today’s complex media environment, does media coverage influence youth and young adults’ (YYA) tobacco use and intentions? We conceptualize the “public communication environment” and effect mediators, then ask whether over time variation in exogenously measured tobacco media coverage from mass and social media sources predicts daily YYA cigarette smoking intentions measured in a rolling nationally representative phone survey (N = 11,847 on 1,147 days between May 2014 and June 2017). Past week anti-tobacco and pro-tobacco content from Twitter, newspapers, broadcast news, Associated Press, and web blogs made coherent scales (thetas = 0.77 and 0.79). Opportunities for exposure to anti-tobacco content in the past week predicted lower intentions to smoke (Odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, p < .05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.91–1.00). The effect was stronger among current smokers than among nonsmokers (interaction OR = 0.88, p < .05, 95% CI = 0.77–1.00). These findings support specific effects of anti-tobacco media coverage and illustrate a productive general approach to conceptualizing and assessing effects in the complex media environment.

Accuracy of a large language model in distinguishing anti- and pro-vaccination messages on social media: The case of human papillomavirus vaccination

“…At the core of various quantitative and computational approaches exploring the immense volume of online messages generated on these platforms lies the process of human evaluation. Often, multiple researchers or experts assess a subset chosen from a large dataset of online messages, and the insights drawn from the subset are then extrapolated to the entire dataset or to the broader population through statistical assumptions or machine-learning techniques ( Hornik et al, 2022 , Huang et al, 2014 , Shapiro et al, 2017 ). However, the human evaluation process is inherently time-consuming and labor-intensive, demanding extensive collaboration among multiple individuals.…”

Search Term Identification Methods for Computational Health Communication: Word Embedding and Network Approach for Health Content on YouTube

“…Researchers are increasingly interested in understanding the types and accuracy of health-related messages produced in the public communication environment (PCE) [1][2][3][4][5]. Given the proliferation of web-based health information sources and social media platforms in which people generate, share, and access information [6], identifying and capturing what message content individuals are likely to see when looking for information about health (ie, seeking), as well as what information people might encounter while being on the web (ie, scanning) [7][8][9], is crucial in gaining insights into issues, including misinformation or inequities, on web-based platforms within the larger PCE.…”

With or Without the Crowd? The Influence of Coder Characteristics on Coding Decisions Comparing Crowdworkers and Traditional Coders.

“…The issue raised above is intensified by the fact that an increasing number of studies rely on crowdworkers as coders (e.g., Boxmann-Shabtai 2021; Budak, Goel & Rao 2016;Hornik et al 2022). This is reasonable, for crowdworkers are cost-effective and flexible in employment.…”