1978
DOI: 10.2307/1367194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Timber Harvesting on Breeding Birds in a Mixed-Coniferous Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
2
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
33
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Avian species richness was equal on the treated area and an adjacent unharvested comparison area; however, overall abundance was significantly higher on the latter. Franzreb and Ohmart (1978) also found no relationship between avian diversity and measures of vertical habitat complexity. Bird abundances on treated and untreated areas varied among species and guilds, probably reflecting differential responses to availability of foraging and nesting substrates.…”
Section: Studies In Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forestsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Avian species richness was equal on the treated area and an adjacent unharvested comparison area; however, overall abundance was significantly higher on the latter. Franzreb and Ohmart (1978) also found no relationship between avian diversity and measures of vertical habitat complexity. Bird abundances on treated and untreated areas varied among species and guilds, probably reflecting differential responses to availability of foraging and nesting substrates.…”
Section: Studies In Southwestern Ponderosa Pine Forestsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In addition, Steller's jay, warbling vireo, black-headed grosbeak, northern flicker, redraped sapsucker, fox sparrow, American robin, chipping sparrow, Townsend's solitaire, broad-tailed hummingbird, dark-eyed junco, dusky flycatcher, and mountain bluebird were generally more abundant (scored > 0) in either tall-shrub and/or pole-sapling clearcuts than in untreated areas. Balda (1979), Franzreb andOhmart (1978), Scott and Gottfried (1983), Blake (1982), and. As designated by the Partners in Flight preliminary list:A = long-distance migrant species, those that breed in North America and spend their nonbreeding period primarily south of the United States; B = short-distance migrant species, those that breed and winter extensively in North America; C = migrants whose breeding range is primarily south of the United StatedMexican border and enter the United States along the Rio Grande Valley or where the Mexican highlands extend across the United States border (these populations largely vacate the United States during the winter months) R = permanent resident species that primarily have overlapping breeding and nonbreeding areas.…”
Section: Reviews Of Bird Use Of Logged Western Forestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Western Bluebirds invaded openings created by clearcut logging (Fisher 1902, Franzreb andOhmart 1978), and nested near farm buildings and along the streets of towns (Jewett et al 1953). They even increased in numbers around cities early in this century (Rathburn 1902, Shepardson 1915.…”
Section: Literature Review Western Bluebird Natural History Distributmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slash pHes may also contribute to the suitability of logged habitat for certain bird species, and future research should attempt to quantify this factor. The influence of logging on breeding-season bird populations has been documented for a variety of forest types in the Western United States: mixed conifer (Franzreb and Ohmart 1978;Mannan and Meslow 1984;Verner and Larson 1989), coastal Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) (Hagar 1960;Meslow 1978), interior Douglas-fir (Medin 1985;Medin and Booth 1989), giant sequoia (Sequoiadendrongiganteum) (Kilgore 1971), lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) (Austin and Perry 1979), and ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa) (Szaro and Balda 1979). Medin (1985) provided a summary of bird species' responses to various logging methods based on several of the cited studies.…”
Section: Research Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%