2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the online and offline purchase environment on consumer choice of familiar and unfamiliar brands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of sensory information on processing of brand information has been previously investigated (e.g., Krishna 2010; Krishna and Schwarz 2014). For example, Saini and Lynch (2016) show that familiar brands are preferred in online settings (relative to offline) when sensory information is diagnostic and plays a role in brand choice. However, hyperconnectivity offers additional research opportunities in this area.…”
Section: Rethinking the Roles And The Functions Of Brandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of sensory information on processing of brand information has been previously investigated (e.g., Krishna 2010; Krishna and Schwarz 2014). For example, Saini and Lynch (2016) show that familiar brands are preferred in online settings (relative to offline) when sensory information is diagnostic and plays a role in brand choice. However, hyperconnectivity offers additional research opportunities in this area.…”
Section: Rethinking the Roles And The Functions Of Brandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, this research may have obtained different results by considering the product types. In addition, product of familiar and unfamiliar brands ( Saini and Lynch, 2016 ) and cocreated product ( Cohen-Vernik et al, 2019 ) may impact our results. Future research can examine the effect of the inconsistent color presentation of prices for these types of products on consumers’ purchase likelihood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The research results suggested that loyalty is also different for online grocery shoppers than for in-store grocery shoppers as Saini and Lynch (2016) or Danaher et al (2003) claimed. While 67% of online grocery shoppers would choose one of the traditional grocery retailers if they would begin offering products online, only 44% of in-store grocery shoppers would do so.…”
Section: Globusmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Based on that, these hypotheses were formulated as: The differences between online and offline grocery shoppers have been explored from different perspectives. Some studies have focused on the differences in consumer behaviour of these groups (Munson et al, 2017;Harris, Riley, Riley, & Hand, 2017), while others have examined the perception of technology and innovation (Maat & Konings, 2018;Moliner-Velázquez et al, 2019) or on differences in loyalty (Saini & Lynch, 2016;Danaher et al, 2003). The research in this paper will focus on differences in the acceptance of new technologies and loyalty between online and offline grocery customers.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation