2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-010-1868-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the mGluR5 receptor antagonist 6-methyl-2-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (MPEP) on behavioural responses to nicotine

Abstract: RationalePrevious studies have shown that blockade of metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGluR5) results in inhibition of nicotine self-administration in experimental animals. However, these studies have not established the behavioural mechanisms which mediate these effects or the extent to which the effects of mGluR5 antagonism on nicotine self-administration reflect a selective attenuation of nicotine reinforcement.ObjectivesTo investigate the effects of antagonising mGluR5 receptors on psychopharmacologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
40
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
40
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results suggested that MPEP may not selectively suppress the primary reinforcing properties of nicotine. It seems unlikely that the reductions in responding on the active and inactive levers in these experiments reflected a generalised suppression of behaviour since, as previously reported (Tessari et al 2004), pretreatment with MPEP did not reduce spontaneous locomotor activity (Tronci et al 2010). Additionally, MPEP pretreatment does not diminish operant responding for a food reward (Bespalov et al 2005;Liechti and Markou 2007a;Tronci et al 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Contextual Stimuli In Psychopharmacological Respsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results suggested that MPEP may not selectively suppress the primary reinforcing properties of nicotine. It seems unlikely that the reductions in responding on the active and inactive levers in these experiments reflected a generalised suppression of behaviour since, as previously reported (Tessari et al 2004), pretreatment with MPEP did not reduce spontaneous locomotor activity (Tronci et al 2010). Additionally, MPEP pretreatment does not diminish operant responding for a food reward (Bespalov et al 2005;Liechti and Markou 2007a;Tronci et al 2010).…”
Section: The Role Of Contextual Stimuli In Psychopharmacological Respsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Pretreatment with MPEP not only suppressed active lever presses but also suppressed responding on the inactive lever. This was also true for the effects of MPEP on nicotine self-administration (Tronci et al 2010). The results suggested that MPEP may not selectively suppress the primary reinforcing properties of nicotine.…”
Section: The Role Of Contextual Stimuli In Psychopharmacological Respmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 3 more Smart Citations