2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychosocial well-being of people with disabilities

Abstract: Background Before the COVID-19 pandemic, people with mobility, vision, hearing, and cognitive disabilities were at a higher risk of lower psychosocial well-being than people without disabilities. It is, therefore, of great importance to investigate whether the pandemic has exacerbated this difference. Objective This study examines whether people with disabilities (categorized as mobility, vision, hearing, cognitive, and any disabilities) report more COVID-19-related neg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pandemic’s burden on mental health is associated with multiple intersecting factors, including economic decline resulting in increased job insecurity [ 3 , 4 ]; housing precarity [ 5 , 6 ]; childcare disruptions and school closures [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]; increased risk of interpersonal violence [ 10 , 11 ]; and general disruption to daily routines [ 12 ]. Furthermore, the burden of COVID-19 disease, and its psychosocial sequelae, has disproportionately impacted certain populations, such as children and youth [ 12 , 13 ], cisgender women [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], minoritized communities [ 17 , 18 ], people who use drugs [ 19 ], older adults [ 20 , 21 ], people with disabilities [ 22 , 23 ], and LGBTQIA+ individuals [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pandemic’s burden on mental health is associated with multiple intersecting factors, including economic decline resulting in increased job insecurity [ 3 , 4 ]; housing precarity [ 5 , 6 ]; childcare disruptions and school closures [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]; increased risk of interpersonal violence [ 10 , 11 ]; and general disruption to daily routines [ 12 ]. Furthermore, the burden of COVID-19 disease, and its psychosocial sequelae, has disproportionately impacted certain populations, such as children and youth [ 12 , 13 ], cisgender women [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], minoritized communities [ 17 , 18 ], people who use drugs [ 19 ], older adults [ 20 , 21 ], people with disabilities [ 22 , 23 ], and LGBTQIA+ individuals [ 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To curb the spread of the virus, various containment measures, such as social distancing, working remotely, closure of leisure facilities, and restrictions on gatherings, have been instituted [ 1 , 2 ]. People with disabilities have been particularly vulnerable to many of the negative consequences of these measures [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People with disabilities are a heterogenous group of individuals with varying levels of needs and abilities. Several subgroups can be identified, such as mobility, vision, hearing, and cognitive disabilities, and various disabilities can manifest together [ 7 , 13 , 27 ]. Disability severity can vary from mild to very severe, inducing different consequences for those with disabilities [ 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there is still the lack in knowledge on pandemic consequences to particular communities, it is already evidenced that it is a big mistake to treat all people with disabilities as a general group. The changes in living conditions because pandemic restrictions affected people with disabilities differently (Holm et al, 2022). Some of the disabled had not sufficient access to full and timely information while being at home as they were unable to retrieve it due to their hearing or visual impairment and the technical inadequacy of the public information sources (Goggin and Ellis, 2020; Sabatello et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%