Psychology and Criminal Justice
DOI: 10.1515/9783110804799.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of the Cognitive Interview on Recall, Recognition and the Confidence/Accuracy Relationship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Such improvements are similar to those observed in other studies that have used the SI as a control (e.g. adults, Gwyer & Clifford, 1997;children, Holliday, 2003a,b;metaanalysis, Köhnken et al, 1999). Although it may be impossible to eliminate underlying age differences in recall (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Such improvements are similar to those observed in other studies that have used the SI as a control (e.g. adults, Gwyer & Clifford, 1997;children, Holliday, 2003a,b;metaanalysis, Köhnken et al, 1999). Although it may be impossible to eliminate underlying age differences in recall (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…classroom disruption) and then recruit witnesses as participants after the fact 7 (e.g. Gwyer & Clifford, 1997). Some initially disguise the nature of their investigation (e.g.…”
Section: Potential Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of the passage of time on eyewitness performance is a subject that has been neglected by researchers. (Gwyer & Clifford, 1997). However, because the interval between a witness's initial encounter with a perpetrator and a lineup identification is one factor that can be known in virtually all applied contexts, it would be quite useful to understand how delay mediates both the objective possibility of accurate performance and the processing strategies applied to the task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This analysis raises the possibility that enhancing recall of contextual information about the original meeting with the target might help seniors avoid false identifications in the lineup situation. Although prior evidence on this issue is mixed, Gwyer and Clifford (1997) found that an interview that incorporated context reinstatement techniques reduced false choices in target-absent lineups. Positive effects of context reinstatement on lineup identification also were found by Malpass and Devine (1981); Krafka and Penrod (1985); Cutler, Penrod, and Martens (1987); Cutler and Penrod (1988); and Smith and Vela (1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Finally, the interviewer also asks the witness to actively visualize the target and his or her appearance. Although the original findings by Malpass and Devine (1981) on improving eyewitness identifications after a long delay by reinstating the mental context of the witnesses appeared promising, later attempts to use the classical cognitive interview techniques or various components thereof to improve identification performance appeared less successful (Clifford & Gwyer, 1999;Cutler et al, 1987a;Fisher, McCauley, & Geiselman, 1994;Gwyer & Clifford, 1997;Searcy, Bartlett, Memon, & Swanson, 2001). Finger and Pezdek (1999) have even found that identification accuracy deteriorated when participants described a target immediately before trying to identify him (Experiment 1; presumably due to verbal overshadowing Á see below) but not when the identification task followed after some delay (Experiments 2 and 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%