2019
DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2019.1647031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of the class-wide function-related intervention teams on behaviors of an elementary student with autism spectrum disorder in an inclusive classroom in Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methodologically, the study offers valuable insights for future studies aiming to investigate complex interventions and pedagogical systems with similar research inquiries. As demonstrated by previous single case studies in related fields, utilizing students' individual developmental trajectories and within-individual reference norms can yield reliable results in assessing the effectiveness of interventions (Franzen and Kamps, 2008;Hill and Flores, 2014;Nelson et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2019). Also the data collection method, DBR, employed in this study has proven successful in generating valid outcomes regarding disruptive behavior teacher evaluations (Casale et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Methodologically, the study offers valuable insights for future studies aiming to investigate complex interventions and pedagogical systems with similar research inquiries. As demonstrated by previous single case studies in related fields, utilizing students' individual developmental trajectories and within-individual reference norms can yield reliable results in assessing the effectiveness of interventions (Franzen and Kamps, 2008;Hill and Flores, 2014;Nelson et al, 2018;Wu et al, 2019). Also the data collection method, DBR, employed in this study has proven successful in generating valid outcomes regarding disruptive behavior teacher evaluations (Casale et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“… n.a. Sanetti & Collier-Meek (2015) [ 76 ] Number of disruptive behavior 6 S1: 10.08–8.01 S2: 12.00–12.32 S3: 12.35–11.97 S4: 11.47–8.15 S5: 6.65–4.66 S6: 2.00–0.73 n.a Wu et al (2019) [ 77 ] On-task behavior Disruptive behavior 1 21%–72% 78%–35% n.a n.a. a = Percent rounded due to representation S = Student G = Grade C = Classroom.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Campus culture changed to a more positive environment. Positive repercussions for students concerning academic success at higher grade levels Wu et al (2019) [ 77 ] CW-FIT S, T Taiwan MM (9w) T1 = Reviewed three behavior expectations T 2 = Additional self-management Disruptive behavior CW-FIT is an effective intervention in increasing students on-task behaviors and decreasing disruptive behaviors. Implementing multiple tiers of CW-FIT was much more effective than implementing solely Tier 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results revealed increases in the students' overall engagement and a more positive classroom environment. More recently, Wu et al (2019) found supplementing CW-FIT with self-management (CW-FIT w/ SM) was much more effective in increasing the on-task behavior and decreasing the disruptive behavior of a student with an autism spectrum disorder than implementing CW-FIT alone. The procedure and outcome of the CW-FIT w/ SM intervention were well-received by the general education teacher and the students.…”
Section: Cw-fit With Self-managementmentioning
confidence: 99%