1985
DOI: 10.2307/747943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Text Manipulation and Multiple Reading Strategies on the Reading Performance of Good and Poor Readers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
1
2

Year Published

1988
1988
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The research on repeated readings suggests it to be an effective strategy for improving word recognition, reading fluency, and reading comprehension (Herman, 1985;Samuels, 1979;Taylor, Wade, & Yekovich, 1985). This study, however, suggests that repeated readings with support is better than repeated readings without support, at least with the difficulty level of the books used in the experiment.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
“…The research on repeated readings suggests it to be an effective strategy for improving word recognition, reading fluency, and reading comprehension (Herman, 1985;Samuels, 1979;Taylor, Wade, & Yekovich, 1985). This study, however, suggests that repeated readings with support is better than repeated readings without support, at least with the difficulty level of the books used in the experiment.…”
contrasting
confidence: 47%
“…Practice was found to improve significantly decoding skills (Thomas & Clapp, 1989), spelling (Stanovich & West, 1989), speed and accuracy of reading, namely fluency (Chafouleas, Martens, Dobson, Weinstein, & Gardner, 2004;Dowhower, 1987;Peterson, Scott & Sroka, 1990;Rashotte & Torgesen, 1985;Rasinski, 1990;Taguchi, 1997;Taguchi & Gorsuch, 2002) reading comprehension (Dowhower, 1987;Homan, 1991;Reutzel & Hollingsworth, 1993;Taguchi & Gorsuch, 2002;Taylor, Wade & Yekovich, 1985) and overall linguistic performance, including vocabulary and oral discourse. However, results of a large number of studies led to the conclusion that non-repetitive procedures based on reading a large number of passages with repetitive words, and assisted rather than unassisted practice are preferable when efficiency in reading is desired (Blum, Koskinen, Tennant, Parker, Straub & Curry, 1995;Cunningham & Stanovich, 1990, 1991Dowhower, 1987;Koskinen, Bisson, Phillips, Creamer & Baker, 1999;Rashotte & Torgesen, 1985).…”
Section: Studies Of Reading Practicementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Samuels et al (1992) and Rasinski (1991), among others, suggest that students develop automaticity through repeated exposures to words in context. Repeated readings have been found to effectively improve the oral reading and comprehension of normally achieving students (e.g., Martinez & Roser, 1985;Taylor, Wade, & Yekovich, 1985) and of disabled and developmental readers of various ages (e.g., Dowhower, 1989;Rasinski, 1989).…”
Section: Goals For Our Fluency-based Reading Programmentioning
confidence: 99%