2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of temperature increases on a temperate phytoplankton community — A mesocosm climate change scenario

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
21
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
21
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Both investigations indicate that large cells (especially diatoms, which constituted most of the phytoplankton biomass) are favored by the increase in temperature (with or without additional UV-B), while small cells are negatively affected (Table 4a). Variable responses to temperature have been reported in previous work; while Halac et al (2010) and Lassen et al (2010) (2010) show a negative effect of warming on large cells (particularly diatoms) possibly related to an increased respiratory demand. The characteristics of our experiment (short duration, which is appropriate for the duration of blooms in temperate environments, and mid-range temperature) are more similar to those of Lassen et al (2010), since Wohlers et al (2009) followed a community over 1 mo at temperatures less than 8°C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Both investigations indicate that large cells (especially diatoms, which constituted most of the phytoplankton biomass) are favored by the increase in temperature (with or without additional UV-B), while small cells are negatively affected (Table 4a). Variable responses to temperature have been reported in previous work; while Halac et al (2010) and Lassen et al (2010) (2010) show a negative effect of warming on large cells (particularly diatoms) possibly related to an increased respiratory demand. The characteristics of our experiment (short duration, which is appropriate for the duration of blooms in temperate environments, and mid-range temperature) are more similar to those of Lassen et al (2010), since Wohlers et al (2009) followed a community over 1 mo at temperatures less than 8°C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Variable responses to temperature have been reported in previous work; while Halac et al (2010) and Lassen et al (2010) (2010) show a negative effect of warming on large cells (particularly diatoms) possibly related to an increased respiratory demand. The characteristics of our experiment (short duration, which is appropriate for the duration of blooms in temperate environments, and mid-range temperature) are more similar to those of Lassen et al (2010), since Wohlers et al (2009) followed a community over 1 mo at temperatures less than 8°C. The variability in response to light (or UV radiation, van Donk et al 2001) and temperature is surely affected by the composition of the phytoplankton community and probably also by acclimation processes (Villafañe et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is in line with those of Sommer & Lewandowska (2011), who also found phytoplankton (carbon) bio mass to decrease with warming and higher copepod density. Other mesocosm experiments have also detected negative ef fects of elevated temperature on phytoplankton biomass (Keller et al 1999, O'Connor et al 2009, Lassen et al 2010, Lewandowska & Sommer 2010) and a general reduction in phyto plankton cell size (Lewan dow s ka & Sommer 2010). Although, re du ced phytoplankton (carbon) biomass and POC accumulation in ses ton at higher copepod density and temperature point to an enhancement in copepod grazing pressure, PN and POP were not affected by copepod grazing or temperature in this study.…”
Section: Bloom Timing and Changes In The Pom Poolmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some studies have detected negative effects of rising temperature on phytoplankton biomass (Keller et al 1999, O'Connor et al 2009, Lassen et al 2010, Lewandowska & Sommer 2010 or, as a consequence of an enhancement in ocean stratification, on primary production (Behrenfeld et al 2006). Some of these studies related the negative effect of warming on phytoplankton biomass to increased abundances of zooplankton (Keller et al 1999, O'Connor et al 2009 or enhanced grazing pressure (Lewandowska & Sommer 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%