1991
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(91)90221-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of superior colliculus lesions in hamsters: Feature detection versus spatial localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bilateral ablation of the hamster's SC causes deficits in orienting, but, again, the animals are clearly not blind (Schneider, 1969;Thinus-Blanc, Scardigli, & Buhot, 1991;Carman & Schneider, 1992). Pattern discrimination skills survive bilateral ablation of the SC (Schneider, 1969).…”
Section: Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bilateral ablation of the hamster's SC causes deficits in orienting, but, again, the animals are clearly not blind (Schneider, 1969;Thinus-Blanc, Scardigli, & Buhot, 1991;Carman & Schneider, 1992). Pattern discrimination skills survive bilateral ablation of the SC (Schneider, 1969).…”
Section: Rodentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Histological staining has revealed a laminar structure, with the superficial layers involved in the processing of spatial information on the basis of visual signals, whereas the deeper layers receive signals from vision, audition, and tactile sensations, allowing multisensory representations of space (May, 2005;Wallace, Wilkinson, & Stein, 1996). Ablation studies in cats (Burnett, Stein, Chaponis, & Wallace, 2004;Lomber, Payne, & Cornwell, 2001), rats (Overton & Dean, 1988), and hamsters (Thinusblanc, Scardigli, & Buhot, 1991) have demonstrated a causal link between activity in the SC and the production of orienting behaviors and responses to novelty. For example, Lomber et al (2001) unilaterally deactivated the superficial layer of the SC in cats and found profound orienting deficits for both moving and stationary visual stimuli presented in the contralateral hemispace.…”
Section: A Return To Physiologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, visual wulst and visual cortex both hold an orderly representation of the visual field, and such topographic maps are most probably an ideal basis for fast feature detection (e.g. [ 67 ]) and object localization [ 68 ]. In the case of the visual wulst, we have argued that feature detection or identification may not be its predominant task because there is no foveal overrepresentation which enhances the resolution of the system and supports stimulus identification [ 13 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%