2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2015.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of substrate surface properties on tack performance of acrylic Pressure-Sensitive Adhesives (PSAs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both 70:30 PSTA blends are shifted toward the viscous-dominated regime (tan­(δ) > 1): this imbues them with the high wettability and compliance (Figure C) necessary to quickly form adhesive bonds under pressure (Figure D) that pure HMW polymer cannot. Surface properties were also investigated by measuring the water droplet contact angle (Figure S2), as surface energy may influence interface formation and wetting behavior. Interestingly, the PLCL used here is relatively hydrophilic, producing contact angles less than 90° for all types. However, there are no significant differences between the various PLCL groups at the time of application, which suggests that excellent wetting properties of the LMW PLCL blend PSTAs are largely a function of viscoelasticity and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both 70:30 PSTA blends are shifted toward the viscous-dominated regime (tan­(δ) > 1): this imbues them with the high wettability and compliance (Figure C) necessary to quickly form adhesive bonds under pressure (Figure D) that pure HMW polymer cannot. Surface properties were also investigated by measuring the water droplet contact angle (Figure S2), as surface energy may influence interface formation and wetting behavior. Interestingly, the PLCL used here is relatively hydrophilic, producing contact angles less than 90° for all types. However, there are no significant differences between the various PLCL groups at the time of application, which suggests that excellent wetting properties of the LMW PLCL blend PSTAs are largely a function of viscoelasticity and mechanical properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many carbonate groups () in the PC substrate, thus the hydrogen bonding interactions between carbonate groups in the PC surface and urethane groups in the RPUA play a major important role in the adhesion to the PC substrate. Furthermore, the surface free energy of PC substrate (38.2 mJ/m 2 ) is higher than that of S‐steel substrate (35.6 mJ/m 2 ), which lead to superior wettability 42 . Thus the ultimate lap shear strength for all RPUA on the PC substrate is greater than on S‐steel substrate.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These results are because of the surface wettability of the acrylic PSA films. The adhesive characteristics of acrylic PSA film are greatly influenced by the wettability of the surface [ 44 , 45 , 46 ]. When the hydrophilicity of the acrylic PSA film is increased, the surface energy is increased to improve interaction with the substrate, thereby increasing the adhesive strength.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%