1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb10451.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The EFFECTS OF SUBSTANCE P AND RELATED PEPTIDES ON Α‐AMYLASE RELEASE FROM RAT PAROTID GLAND SLICES

Abstract: 1 The effects of substance P and related peptides on amylase release from rat parotid gland slices have been investigated. 2 Supramaximal concentrations (1 F.M) of substance P caused enhancement of amylase release over the basal level within 1 min; this lasted for at least 40 min at 30°C. 3 Substance P-stimulated amylase release was partially dependent on extracellular calcium and could be inhibited by 50% upon removal of extracellular calcium.4 Substance P stimulated amylase release in a dose-dependent manner… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1982
1982
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lundberg (1981) demonstrated that in the cat submandibular gland, more than one transmitter may be released from the same axon terminal. Further, recent evidence shows that vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and substance P, both of which have been localized within nerves innervating the salivary glands, can stimulate protein secretion from the parotid gland (Brown & Hanley, 1981;Ekstr6m, Mansson & Tobin, 1982;Inoue & Kanno, 1982;Gallacher, 1983), and preliminary results suggest that non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic stimulation may be responsible for some ofthe protein normally secreted in parasympathetic saliva (Anderson, Ekstr6m, Garrett & Thulin, 1983). Ekstroim & Wahlestedt (1982) reported an increased sensitivity to substance P with respect to flow rate in sympathectomized rats, but no sensitization for VIP was observed by .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lundberg (1981) demonstrated that in the cat submandibular gland, more than one transmitter may be released from the same axon terminal. Further, recent evidence shows that vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and substance P, both of which have been localized within nerves innervating the salivary glands, can stimulate protein secretion from the parotid gland (Brown & Hanley, 1981;Ekstr6m, Mansson & Tobin, 1982;Inoue & Kanno, 1982;Gallacher, 1983), and preliminary results suggest that non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic stimulation may be responsible for some ofthe protein normally secreted in parasympathetic saliva (Anderson, Ekstr6m, Garrett & Thulin, 1983). Ekstroim & Wahlestedt (1982) reported an increased sensitivity to substance P with respect to flow rate in sympathectomized rats, but no sensitization for VIP was observed by .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain tissues such as guinea-pig ileum and rat parotid gland, physalaemin is invariably more potent than SP, whilst eledoisin and kassinin are less active (Hanley & Iversen, 1980;Brown & Hanley, 1981;Gater et al 1982). In other tissues, however, the reverse order of potencies has been observed (Erspamer, Falconieri Erspamer & Linari, 1977;Iversen, Lee, Sandberg & Watson, 1982;Bailey, Gater & Jordan, 1982) and it is possible, therefore, that different subpopulations of receptors mediate responses in these tissues.…”
Section: Effect Of Extracellular Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic field stimulus-evoked amylase release could be superimposed upon the VIP-evoked secretion even at 10-7 M-VIP. However substance P at 5 x 10-9 M (saturating concentrations of this peptide for amylase release in rat parotid are reported as 10-7-10-6 M: Brown & Hanley, 1981) did mimic all the effects of non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic field stimulation, including the 86Rb efflux, and there was a notable interaction between the non-cholinergic, non-adrenergic field stimulus responses and the response to exogenous substance P. Superfusion of substance P resulted in a marked secretion of amylase and 86Rb efflux, but in the continued presence of the agonist these effects rapidly returned to basal levels i.e. desensitization.…”
Section: V Gallachermentioning
confidence: 99%