1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0387-7604(98)00092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of stimulus rates on the amplitude of median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: the developmental change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the VEEG recording, the trend‐SEP‐C calculates the latencies and the amplitude values of SEP components and the analysis allows combination of these values with behavioural states related to the EEG period. This is important because it has been demonstrated that SEPs are severely affected by the state of brain activity . We found that latencies and amplitudes of cortical SEPs (N1 component and complex N1‐P1) have lower values during AS and quiet‐wakefulness phases than in the QS phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the VEEG recording, the trend‐SEP‐C calculates the latencies and the amplitude values of SEP components and the analysis allows combination of these values with behavioural states related to the EEG period. This is important because it has been demonstrated that SEPs are severely affected by the state of brain activity . We found that latencies and amplitudes of cortical SEPs (N1 component and complex N1‐P1) have lower values during AS and quiet‐wakefulness phases than in the QS phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…SEP‐C measurements were performed in agreement with Bongers‐Schokking et al, who advocate that SEP recording in newborn infants should involve use of a band‐pass filter of 1–100Hz with a low number of stimuli (25–50), paying close attention to the behavioural state of the infant. They demonstrated that a wide band‐pass filter (>100Hz) induces unacceptable distortion of the scalp potentials and signal artefacts, while the application of less than 50 stimuli is sufficient to obtain a cortical response but prevents system exhaustion . In our case the left and right median nerves were stimulated asynchronously and alternately 50 times to obtain reproducible SEP waves.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…There are several methodological points that enabled us to detect SERs from single trials with such a high success rate. Prior work has suggested that the occurrence and magnitude of SERs in the immature cortex are affected by the preceding and/or simultaneous cortical activity (Khazipov et al, ; Milh et al, ), and a long refractory period of the infant responses is thought to underlie possible failure or modification in sensory responses when using too short interstimulus intervals (Araki, Takada, Yasuhara, & Kobayashi, ; Gibson, Brezinova, & Levene, ; Vanhatalo & Lauronen, ; Verley, ). In order to ensure a higher SER occurrence, we used adaptive interstimulus intervals up to several seconds and intended to give the stimuli at periods with minimal EEG background activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several works have investigated the effect of applying different stimulation rates in the SEP morphology (Kritchevsky and Wiederholt, 1978;Pratt et al, 1980;Delberghe et al, 1990;Huttunen and Hömberg, 1991;Larrea et al, 1992;Huttunen et al, 1993;Fujii et al, 1994;Manzano et al, 1995;Nagamine et al, 1998;Araki et al, 1999;Gobbelé et al, 1999;Urasaki et al, 2002;Onishi et al, 1991). However, the majority of these studies has analyzed the mean nerve SEP and has been based on the morphological analysis instead of statistical tests for objective response detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%