1993
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1993.tb00550.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Standardized Testing on Teaching and Schools

Abstract: How much influence does standardized testing exert on teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms? Is there any difference between the impact of testing on low‐SES and high‐SES classrooms? How much impact does “teaching to the test” appear to have on test scores?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bureaucratic performance pressures create a negative reaction among teaching professionals toward teachers and principals being held accountable for students' academic performance, making student achievement evaluations, assessing teacher and principal performance, awarding successful schools, or punishing unsuccessful ones. This dissatisfaction with performance accountability policies is confirmed by studies (Herman & Golan, 1991;Ikeler, 2010;Mathers, 2000). Likewise, in the case of performance accountability, some inappropriate practices and behaviors can emerge to prove the school is highperforming, such as narrowing the curriculum, teaching for a test, including high performing students but excluding low performers (Figlio & Loeb, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion and Theoretical/practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Bureaucratic performance pressures create a negative reaction among teaching professionals toward teachers and principals being held accountable for students' academic performance, making student achievement evaluations, assessing teacher and principal performance, awarding successful schools, or punishing unsuccessful ones. This dissatisfaction with performance accountability policies is confirmed by studies (Herman & Golan, 1991;Ikeler, 2010;Mathers, 2000). Likewise, in the case of performance accountability, some inappropriate practices and behaviors can emerge to prove the school is highperforming, such as narrowing the curriculum, teaching for a test, including high performing students but excluding low performers (Figlio & Loeb, 2011).…”
Section: Discussion and Theoretical/practical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…E ainda, alguns pesquisadores (Khaniya, 1990b;Pearson, 1988;Swain, 1985) Wesdorp (1982), nos Países Baixos, que averiguou a introdução de testes de múltipla-escolha para avaliar a língua materna e estrangeira; a de Hughes (1988), na Turquia, para estudar se inovações feitas em testes trariam mudanças nos currículos escolares; Khaniya (1990), no Nepal, que investigou o efeito retroativo da 'School Leaving Certificate' ao final do ensino secundário para entrar no nível superior. Herman and Golan (1993) (Alderson, 1992;Gimenez, 1988Gimenez, , 1997Gimenez, , 1998Gimenez, , 1999Hamp-Lyons, 1996;Scaramucci 1992Scaramucci , 1996Scaramucci , 1997Scaramucci , 1998Scaramucci a, b, 1999c. 2002;Wall, 2000;Watanabe, 1996) nos permitiram ver que o efeito retroativo não é um fenômeno completamente entendido e consolidado.…”
Section: Estudos Sobre Efeito Retroativo: Breve Panorama Históricounclassified
“…These consequences have subsequently caused a lot of pressure on teachers. For example, Madaus (1985) and Herman et al (1990) stated that test scores from standardized examinations have been used as a basis in making important decisions which are attached to significant consequences for teachers, such as in terms of promotion and funding. Herman et al (1990) coined the term 'accountability pressure' to refer to the teachers' pressure related to the standardized tests and their implications.…”
Section: Pressure To Improve Scores and Classroom Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%