2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of stakeholder education and capacity building in marine protected areas: A case study from southern Mozambique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, Mozambique appears as a particularly interesting setting under institutional voids, suitable to highlight the different influence of corporate motives for CSR on SD, and the effects of the Ubuntu ethical pressures on this relationship. Other studies have considered SD in Mozambique, with specific attention given to agriculture (Sánchez-Reparaz, 2020), energy (Ahlborg & Hammar, 2014), water basin (Alba et al, 2017), marine preservation (Lucrezi et al, 2019), and biofuel sustainability (Schut et al, 2010). All these studies have validated that SD in Mozambique is an effective practice to support management agendas, thus confirming the validity of the country as a research setting for this study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, Mozambique appears as a particularly interesting setting under institutional voids, suitable to highlight the different influence of corporate motives for CSR on SD, and the effects of the Ubuntu ethical pressures on this relationship. Other studies have considered SD in Mozambique, with specific attention given to agriculture (Sánchez-Reparaz, 2020), energy (Ahlborg & Hammar, 2014), water basin (Alba et al, 2017), marine preservation (Lucrezi et al, 2019), and biofuel sustainability (Schut et al, 2010). All these studies have validated that SD in Mozambique is an effective practice to support management agendas, thus confirming the validity of the country as a research setting for this study.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Looking specifically at Mozambique, the dearth of existing studies does not allow for sketching a comprehensive understanding of the orientation and relevance of SD. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, an interesting suggestion comes from the research by Lucrezi et al (2019), who aimed to provide empirical evidence of the impact of SD on marine protected area management in the southern village of Ponta do Ouro. The findings confirm that SD is effective in supporting management agendas and collaborative processes of knowledge acquisition, fieldwork, and educational experiences.…”
Section: The Peculiarity Of Mozambique As a Research Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout the humpback dolphins’ range, public engagement is practised in some habitats, such as the Pearl River Estuary (http://hkdcs.org/) and central west Gulf of Thailand (Dr Suwat Jutapruet, personal communication). Public engagement is essential for humpback dolphin conservation against improper CEME planning through citizen‐science practices informing biodiversity baselines (Chandler et al, 2017; Harvey et al, 2018), the participation of local communities (Agrawal & Redford, 2006; Gaymer et al, 2014), marine environmental education (Lucrezi et al, 2019; Sakurai & Uehara, 2020) and efficient information delivery between stakeholders from the science, conservation, resource‐extraction and development sectors (Boon & Baxter, 2020; Huang et al, 2020). For humpback dolphins in CEME‐disturbed habitats, habitat protection planning needs to address current gaps that hinder the above stakeholder engagement campaigns (Table 3).…”
Section: Informed Habitat Protection Planning For Coastal Cetaceans I...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wetland management has therefore called for the involvement of various stakeholders. Stakeholders are individuals, organisations or institutions that support or oppose a research project or are potentially affected by the management of wetlands (Darradi et al., 2006; Devarani & Basu, 2009; Lucrezi et al., 2019). Generally, the wetland stakeholders include development partners, river basin organisations, sub‐basin organisations, local and international NGOs, community‐based organisations, the private sector, academic and research institutions (MacDonald, 2007; Merrey, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%