2018
DOI: 10.2196/resprot.9484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Social Presence on Adherence-Focused Guidance in Problematic Cannabis Users: Protocol for the CANreduce 2.0 Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: BackgroundIn European countries, including Switzerland, cannabis is the most commonly used illicit drug. Offering a Web-based self-help tool could potentially reach users who otherwise would not seek traditional help. However, such Web-based self-help tools often suffer from low adherence.ObjectiveThrough adherence-focused guidance enhancements, the aim of this study was to increase adherence in cannabis users entering a Web-based self-help tool to reduce their cannabis use and, in this way, augment its effect… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich on July 4, 2016 (BASEC 2016-00264) and registered (ISRCTN11086185). A detailed study protocol has been published [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Canton of Zurich on July 4, 2016 (BASEC 2016-00264) and registered (ISRCTN11086185). A detailed study protocol has been published [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods Secondary analysis of cannabis users recruited in the general population in the CANreduce 2.0 study of the 2 active intervention groups (N = 367). For the analyses, these participants were divided into 4 groups according to their achieved General Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) score: Minimal (GAD-7 score: 0-4; N = 102), mild (5)(6)(7)(8)(9); N = 151), moderate (10)(11)(12)(13)(14); N = 78) and severe (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21); N = 36) anxiety disorder. Their treatment courses were compared by Intention-to-treat analyses with regard to their cannabis use and their scores on the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT), the Se-verity of Dependence Scale (SDS), the GAD-7, the Center of Epidemiologic Studies of Depression Scale (CES-D) and with regard to their adherence.…”
Section: Häufige Komorbiditätenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Um einem möglichen Bias durch Drop-Out zu entgegnen [21], kommt die Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Analyse zur Anwendung. Das bedeutet, dass auch Personen, die nicht mehr für eine Nachbefragung verfügbar waren, mit ausgewertet werden.…”
Section: Statistische Verfahrenunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations