2015
DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2015.58054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Social Interaction and Social Norm Compliance in Pay-What-You-Want Situations

Abstract: Since Pay-What-You-Want is a relatively new field of study, the influence factors during the pricing process are not sufficiently explored. It was hypothesized that in a hypothetical Pay-What-YouWant situation, increased social interaction and social norm compliance would lead to a higher willingness to pay for a travel mug. In a laboratory experiment, 79 German students were randomly assigned to three groups which varied in the degree of social interaction. Social norm compliance was assessed with a questionn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, people do pay a price significantly higher than zero [14] [27] added to the list by indicating that social norm compliance influences a customer's willingness to pay, although their results were not statistically significant. Subsequently, Dorn and Suessmair [28] showed the positive effect of personal interaction on a customer's willingness to pay during a payment situation in the PWYW context.…”
Section: Pay-what-you-wantmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…However, people do pay a price significantly higher than zero [14] [27] added to the list by indicating that social norm compliance influences a customer's willingness to pay, although their results were not statistically significant. Subsequently, Dorn and Suessmair [28] showed the positive effect of personal interaction on a customer's willingness to pay during a payment situation in the PWYW context.…”
Section: Pay-what-you-wantmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Particularly, the role of anonymity for payments is emphasized (e.g., Regner and Riener, 2012;Machado and Sinha, 2013) and analyzed (e.g., Jang and Chu, 2012). If social interaction is allowed in a PWYW setting, higher payments are the result (Hilbert and Suessmair, 2015). Overall, the studies either show or emphasize that in PWYW situations other regarding preferences, such as fairness considerations or altruism, and identity play a role.…”
Section: Dictator and Trust Games In The Lliterature On Pwyw Pricingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The empirical results obtained to date (see Table 1) predominantly indicate that buyer anonymity decreases the average amount paid in PWYW settings (Bondos and Lipowski, 2016;Dorn and Suessmair, 2016;Hilbert and Suessmair, 2015;Kim et al, 2014a (study 1); Lee et al, 2015;Machado and Sinha, 2012;Pöyry and Parvinen, 2014;Riener and Traxler, 2012;Morwitz, 2011, 2013;Veit and Ammermann, 2013). However, the negative effects are primarily reported in studies of hypothetical intentions to pay in student samples whose validity is highly questionable.…”
Section: Buyer Anonymitymentioning
confidence: 98%