The effects of small class sizes on students' academic achievement, socioemotional development and well‐being in special education: A systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundClass size reductions in general education are some of the most researched educational interventions in social science, yet researchers have not reached any final conclusions regarding their effects. While research on the relationship between general education class size and student achievement is plentiful, research on class size in special education is scarce, even though class size issues must be considered particularly important to students with special educational needs. These students compose a highly diverse group in terms of diagnoses, functional levels, and support needs, but they share a common need for special educational accommodations, which often entails additional instructional support in smaller units than what is normally provided in general education. At this point, there is however a lack of clarity as to the effects of special education class sizes on student academic achievement and socioemotional development. Inevitably, such lack of clarity is an obstacle for special educators and policymakers trying to make informed decisions. This highlights the policy relevance of the current systematic review, in which we sought to examine the effects of small class sizes in special education on the academic achievement, socioemotional development, and well‐being of children with special educational needs.ObjectivesThe objective of this systematic review was to uncover and synthesise data from studies to assess the impact of small class sizes on the academic achievement, socioemotional development, and well‐being of students with special educational needs. We also aimed to investigate the extent to which the effects differed among subgroups of students. Finally, we planned to perform a qualitative exploration of the experiences of children, teachers, and parents with class size issues in special education.Search MethodsRelevant studies were identified through electronic searches in bibliographic databases, searches in grey literature resources, searches using Internet search engines, hand‐searches of specific targeted journals, and citation‐tracking. The following bibliographic databases were searched in April 2021: ERIC (EBSCO‐host), Academic Search Premier (EBSCO‐host), EconLit (EBSCO‐host), APA PsycINFO (EBSCO‐host), SocINDEX (EBSCO‐host), International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (ProQuest), Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest), and Web of Science (Clarivate, Science Citation Index Expanded & Social Sciences Citation Index). EBSCO OPEN Dissertations was also searched in April 2021, while the remaining searches for grey literature, hand‐searches in key journals, and citation‐tracking took place between January and May 2022.Selection CriteriaThe intervention in this review was a small special education class size. Eligible quantitative study designs were studies that used a well‐defined control or comparison group, that is, studies where there was a comparison between students in smaller classes and students in larger classes. Children with special educational needs in grades K‐12 (or the equivalent in European countries) in special education were eligible. In addition to exploring the effects of small class sizes in special education from a quantitative perspective, we aimed to gain insight into the lived experiences of children, teachers, and parents with class size issues in special education contexts, as they are presented in the qualitative research literature. The review therefore also included all types of empirical qualitative studies that collected primary data and provided descriptions of main methodological issues such as selection of informants, data collection procedures, and type of data analysis. Eligible qualitative study designs included but were not limited to studies using ethnographic observation or field work formats, or qualitative interview techniques applied to individual or focus group conversations.Data Collection and AnalysisThe literature search yielded a total of 26,141 records which were screened for eligibility based on title and abstract. From these, 262 potentially relevant records were retrieved and screened in full text, resulting in seven studies being included: three quantitative and five qualitative studies (one study contained both eligible quantitative and qualitative data). Two of the quantitative studies could not be used in the data synthesis as they were judged to have a critical risk of bias and, in accordance with the protocol, were excluded from the meta‐analysis on the basis that they would be more likely to mislead than inform. The third quantitative study did not provide enough information enabling us to calculate an effect size and standard error. Meta‐analysis was therefore not possible. Following quality appraisal of the qualitative studies, three qualitative studies were judged to be of sufficient methodological quality. It was not possible to perform a qualitative thematic synthesis since in two of these studies, findings particular to special education class size were scarce. Therefore, only descriptive data extraction could be performed.Main ResultsDespite the comprehensive searches, the present review only included seven studies published between 1926 and 2020. Two studies were purely quantitative (Forness, 1985; Metzner, 1926) and from the U.S. Four studies used qualitative methodology (Gottlieb, 1997; Huang, 2020; Keith, 1993; Prunty, 2012) and were from the US (2), China (1), and Ireland (1). One study, MAGI Educational Services (1995), contained both eligible quantitative and qualitative data and was from the U.S.Authors' ConclusionsThe major finding of the present review was that there were virtually no contemporary quantitative studies exploring the effects of small class sizes in special education, thus making it impossible to perform a meta‐analysis. More research is therefore thoroughly needed. Findings from the summary of included qualitative studies reflected that to the special education students and staff members participating in these studies, smaller class sizes were the preferred option because they allowed for more individualised instruction time and increased teacher attention to students' diverse needs. It should be noted that these studies were few in number and took place in very diverse contexts and across a large time span. There is a need for more qualitative research into the views and experiences of teachers, parents, and school administrators with special education class sizes in different local contexts and across various provision models. But most importantly, future research should strive to represent the voices of children and young people with special needs since they are the experts when it comes to matters concerning their own lives.

Investigation Upon the Interactions Between the Educationalists and the Children in the Greek Kindergarten

“…Subsequently, it became obvious that interactions between the educationalists and the children are affected by the teachers' years of vocational experience since those who possess more than 16 years of service stated that they were more satisfied with the way they interact with children, which aligns with similar researches (Kutluca, 2021;Pianta et al, 2020). In addition, it was discovered that the educationalists who have been posted in a class of more than 21 pupils experience more positive interactions compared to those who are in charge of less populous ones, a finding that diverges from respective results in other studies (Bondebjerg et al, 2023;Li & Li, 2021;Wang & Calvano, 2022), while the geographical location in which the school facility headquarters does not pose any sort of impact on the quality of interactions.…”

‘Trying to stay afloat’: Education professionals' perspectives on the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on children with special educational needs and disabilities

“…The small class sizes meant that pupils with SEND received more attention and tailored support, the pace of lessons was slower, and there was more flexibility to focus on children's individual interests. Interestingly, despite smaller class sizes being one of the most researched educational interventions (Bondebjerg et al, 2021), a recent systematic review by Bondebjerg et al (2023) reported no quantitative studies and very limited qualitative research into the impacts for pupils with SEND. However, our findings appear to align with their conclusions, which indicated that smaller class sizes were the preferred option for pupils with SEND and the staff who support them.…”

When we came back the ball was just not rolling: Special needs educators' perspectives of improvisation through the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…Teachers in this context often teach a large number of learners—ranging from 40 to 60 learners in their classrooms—with limited infrastructure (Adewumi & Mosito, 2019; Kelly et al., 2018). Large class sizes are problematic, because LSEN often need individualised learning programmes that require more time (Bondebjerg et al., 2023). Consequently, with large class numbers, teachers often experience insufficient time in which to offer individualised teaching to their learners (Kelly et al., 2018).…”