1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00132-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of simulated cataract on reading with normal vision and simulated central scotoma

Abstract: Reading rates are slower for persons with low vision than for normally-sighted persons. This study investigated the change in reading performance and reading eye movements when we simulated the two most common causes of low vision--central field loss and cataract--and their combination (scotoma + cataract). Three subjects read sentences with each of these simulated impairments at five different letter sizes. They required larger letters to read with the cataract or scotoma than they did with normal vision, and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Kanonidou et al reported more regressive saccades and longer fixation durations, but similar saccadic amplitudes in strabismic subjects with respect to controls. 8 These findings, together with results from patients with central field loss 9 or from normal subjects with simulated central scotomas, 10 are in line with the hypothesis that a reduced or impaired visual span leads to impaired reading capabilities.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…Furthermore, Kanonidou et al reported more regressive saccades and longer fixation durations, but similar saccadic amplitudes in strabismic subjects with respect to controls. 8 These findings, together with results from patients with central field loss 9 or from normal subjects with simulated central scotomas, 10 are in line with the hypothesis that a reduced or impaired visual span leads to impaired reading capabilities.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The relationship of reading rate and the number of saccades is consistent with previous studies of reading in strabismic amblyopia 2,3,6 and with simulated central scotomas. 20 The increase in saccades during reading in our study may be due to a suppression scotoma associated with anisometropic amblyopia. 21 Central scotomas have been shown to reduce the visual span, and they may cause inaccurate, more frequent saccades during reading.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…If this is not possible, use 2 words with 1 syllable or 1 word with 2 or 3 syllables but no longer than 6 letters. (10) In line 3, the first and last words are 3 syllables and 7 to 8 letters. Of the other 2 words, at least 1 should have 1 or 2 syllables and should not exceed a certain number of letters.…”
Section: Design Of Test Sentencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the increasing relevance of reading performance in clinical routine and research, [9][10][11] international standards should be applied to the evaluation of reading performance. Some of the principles of standardization outlined above have been used to design new reading charts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%