The effects of short-term waterlogging on the lint yield and yield components of cotton with respect to boll position

Kuai, Jie; Zhou, Zhiguo; Wang, Youhua; Meng, Yali; Chen, Binglin; Zhao, Wenqing

doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.03.005

Cited by 54 publications

(74 citation statements)

References 40 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Short-term waterlogging (up to 72 h) have no impact on cotton yield under recommended cultural practices; however, long-term stress (>72 h) reduced lint yield (Bange et al 2004). A short-term waterlogging of 3, 6, 9, and 12 days resulted in marked reduction of 16.4, 24.1, 39.5, and 50.2%, respectively, in lint yield proportionate with a reduction in boll number (Kuai et al 2015).…”

Section: Waterloggingmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…4). Researchers speculated that cotton tap root, main stem biomass, and total plant biomass were reduced under prolonged waterlogged conditions, with reduction in biomass commensurate with a decrease in fruiting branch numbers and lower radiation use efficacy rather than interception of light (Kuai et al 2015). Moreover, waterlogging causes a significant reduction in photosynthesis, main stem elongation, shoot biomass, and main stem leaf number (Christianson et al 2010).…”

Section: Waterloggingmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review

Khan

Tan

Afridi

et al. 2017

Environ Sci Pollut Res

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review outlines nitrogen (N) responses in crop production and potential management decisions to ameliorate abiotic stresses for better crop production. N is a primary constituent of the nucleotides and proteins that are essential for life. Production and application of N fertilizers consume huge amounts of energy, and excess is detrimental to the environment. Therefore, increasing plant N use efficiency (NUE) is important for the development of sustainable agriculture. NUE has a key role in crop yield and can be enhanced by controlling loss of fertilizers by application of humic acid and natural polymers (hydrogels), having high water-holding capacity which can improve plant performance under field conditions. Abiotic stresses such as waterlogging, drought, heat, and salinity are the major limitations for successful crop production. Therefore, integrated management approaches such as addition of aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG), the film antitranspirant (di-1-p-menthene and pinolene) nutrients, hydrogels, and phytohormones may provide novel approaches to improve plant tolerance against abiotic stress-induced damage. Moreover, for plant breeders and molecular biologists, it is a challenge to develop cotton cultivars that can tolerate plant abiotic stresses while having high potential NUE for the future.

show abstract

Section: Waterloggingmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Waterloggingmentioning

confidence: 98%

Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review

Khan

Tan

Afridi

et al. 2017

Environ Sci Pollut Res

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As the WL plants contained significantly fewer bolls on FP 1 , the main contributor to lint yield, significant yield loss was observed in WL early plants in this study. Kuai et al (2015) also reported significant lint yield reduction in the lower canopy of WL cotton due to loss of bolls from FP 1. In contrast to Kuai et al (2015) who observed new growth on upper FB, yield reduction in our study was the result of fewer bolls produced both at upper and lower canopy.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Kuai et al (2015) also reported significant lint yield reduction in the lower canopy of WL cotton due to loss of bolls from FP 1. In contrast to Kuai et al (2015) who observed new growth on upper FB, yield reduction in our study was the result of fewer bolls produced both at upper and lower canopy. This discrepancy is most likely due to the fact that WL crop in this study was not able to support further growth of new fruiting sites.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition, impaired carbon metabolism can induce yield losses in WL plants by arresting the development of new fruiting branches at the top of canopy (Guinn, 1985). Significantly reduced P n and concomitant abscission of GB at post-recovery in the lower canopy highlighted the role of sugar supply for developing fruits (Kuai et al, 2015). In the present study, an immediate reduction in (post-WL) leaf N (%) concentration in the lower canopy leaves indicated that P n and yield reduction could be a consequence of impaired N acquisition.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Ullah¹,

Tan

Bange³

2016

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to an indeterminate growth habit, we hypothesised that different canopy layers of cotton might be variably influenced by soil waterlogging. The field-grown cotton cultivar (Sicot 71BRF) was waterlogged at early (WL early , 77 days after planting [DAP]) and late reproductive phases (WL late , 101 DAP) for 120 h. Data from different canopy layers e.g. bottom eight (MSN 1-8 ), middle five (MSN 9-13 ), and upper five main stem nodes (MSN 14+ ) were collected 1 d (post-WL) and 7 d after termination of waterlogging (postrecovery). Both waterlogging events significantly reduced post-WL dry biomass, leaf N concentration and fruit development on MSN 1-8 . In addition, WL early significantly reduced photosynthesis and increased total soluble sugars (TSS) in the MSN 1-8 and MSN 14+ leaves, although MSN 14+ leaves restored photosynthesis, N levels and TSS at recovery. It suggested that WL plants maintained photosynthesis of the upper leaves possibly by transporting N from the lower canopy leaves. Reduction (22%) in seed cotton yield under WL early was the result of fruit loss from first position fruits of the upper and lower sympodial fruiting branches (FB 1-5 and FB 11+ ). Despite restoring the growth through improved photosynthesis and N supply, no yield recovery on FB 11+ suggested that the plants used these assimilates for growth of the established fruits. No significant yield reduction in response to WL late suggested that the established cotton bolls were less sensitive to abscission across all canopy layers.Keywords: Canopy layers, lint yield, growth phase, leaf development, nitrogen re-mobilisation, photosynthesis. Abbreviation: DAP_days after planting; DW_dry weight; FR_fruit retention; FB 1-5 _lower 5 fruiting nodes; FB 5-10 _middle 5 fruiting nodes; FB 11-15 _top 5 fruiting nodes; GB_green bolls; LAI_leaf area index; MS N1-8 _lower 1-8 main stem nodes; MS N9-13 _middle 9-13 main stem nodes; MS N14-18 _top 14-18 main stem nodes; NWL_non-waterlogged; P n _photosynthesis; post-recovery_7 days after termination of waterlogging; post-WL_ day after termination of waterlogging; pre-WL_pre-waterlogging; SLA_specific leaf area; SLN_specific leaf nitrogen; TSS_total soluble sugars; WL early _waterlogging at early reproductive phase; WL late _waterlogging at late reproductive phase; WL_waterlogged.

show abstract

Morphology, Physiology and Ecology of Cotton

Rehman

Farooq

2019

Cotton Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effects of short-term waterlogging on the lint yield and yield components of cotton with respect to boll position

Cited by 54 publications

References 40 publications

Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review

Nitrogen fertility and abiotic stresses management in cotton crop: a review

Cotton growth and yield dynamics across canopy layers in response to soil waterlogging

Morphology, Physiology and Ecology of Cotton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About