1994
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0485(1994)024<1680:teosfo>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Shear Flow on Propagation of Rossby Waves in the Equatorial Oceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slower westward phase speeds in the presence of equatorially asymmetric background shear had previously been documented from eigensolutions for an idealized mean ECS by Chang and Philander (1989) and Zheng et al (1994). The effects of the background shear on the latitudinal structure of the eigenfunctions were not considered in these earlier studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The slower westward phase speeds in the presence of equatorially asymmetric background shear had previously been documented from eigensolutions for an idealized mean ECS by Chang and Philander (1989) and Zheng et al (1994). The effects of the background shear on the latitudinal structure of the eigenfunctions were not considered in these earlier studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The maximum SLA generated by the cyclonic eddy is about 0.1 m and does not show up clearly in the ADT map (Figure c). As pointed out by Zheng et al (), this eddy may be generated from the shear waves of the Kuroshio (Yuan & Zheng, ; Zheng & Yuan, ). The VADCP‐measured currents at 13‐m depth are toward the right (left) side of the currents at 29 m depth in Transect A (B), while the currents at 13‐ and 29‐m depths are basically toward the same direction in Transect C. The VADCP‐measured currents at 29‐m depth are more or less tangent to the ADT isoclines, indicating that the eddy has little effect on the currents at 29‐m depth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is exactly in this sense that IFD provides an alternative framework. Some of the previous reports include analysis on the data from various channels, e.g., the laboratory data from mechanically generated waves, 30 whose frequency will down shift as they propagate and thus exhibit non-stationary feature; 9,38,53 field data of waves collected by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA); 33 satellite altimetry data for large scale ocean circulation studies; 48,56,84,85 the non-stationary earthquake data; 1,27,49 and laboratory wind data. 32 In all the previous studies, the EMD has been compared with Fourier and other methods to illustrate the associated Hilbert spectral analysis.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%