The Effects of Shared Peptides on Protein Quantitation in Label-Free Proteomics by LC/MS/MS

Abstract

Assessment of differential protein abundance from the observed properties of detected peptides is an essential part of protein profiling based on shotgun proteomics. However, the abundance observed for shared peptides may be due to contributions from multiple proteins that are affected differently by a given treatment. Excluding shared peptides eliminates this ambiguity but may significantly decrease the number of proteins for which abundance estimates can be obtained. Peptide sharing within a family of biologically related proteins does not cause ambiguity if family members have a common response to treatment. On the basis of this concept, we have developed an approach for including shared peptides in the analysis of differential protein abundance in protein profiling. Data from a recent proteomics study of lung tissue from mice exposed to lipopolysaccharide, cigarette smoke, and a combination of these agents are used to illustrate our method. Starting from data where about half of the implicated database protein involved shared peptides, 82% of the affected proteins were grouped into families, based on FASTA annotation, with closure on peptide sharing. In many cases, a common abundance relative to control was sufficient to explain ion-current peak areas for peptides, both unique and shared, that identified biologically related proteins in a peptide-sharing closure group. On the basis of these results, we propose that peptide-sharing closure groups provide a way to include abundance data for shared peptides in quantitative protein profiling by high-throughput mass spectrometry.

Diversity of human skeletal muscle in health and disease: Contribution of proteomics

“…Two distinct peptides were required for protein identification and spliced isoforms of the same gene were not considered. Identified peptides were assigned consistently to the smallest possible list of identified muscle proteins due to their large number of shared peptides [119]. A gene expression profile was conducted on 31 samples, which also included different diseases such as polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) using the Affymetrix platform representing 18,000 genes.…”

Comparative Proteomic Analysis of the Haemophilus ducreyi Porin-Deficient Mutant 35000HP::P2AB

“…This isotope-coded affinity-tagged technique, known as lysine-residue isotope tagging, is a proprietary extension of previously established N-terminal protein labeling techniques (33,55,56). Data analysis was performed as described previously (21).…”

Neuroproteomics — LC-MS Quantitative Approaches

“…Finally, some authors also proposed to analyze the proteins that have shared peptides as a protein group and not individually. However, these proteins can present different regulatory mechanisms, therefore their combination fails to estimate the real variation [150].…”