1992
DOI: 10.2307/3172491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
649
0
23

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 653 publications
(696 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
21
649
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, Keller and Aaker (1992) highlighted the key role of innovation capacity, which influenced both the perceived quality and purchase intention of brands identified with the store's name. Finally, Beristain and Zorrilla (2011) posited that consumers who perceive a store as a competent firm, with know-how and experience, may also perceive it as developing high-quality own brands.…”
Section: Store Social Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, Keller and Aaker (1992) highlighted the key role of innovation capacity, which influenced both the perceived quality and purchase intention of brands identified with the store's name. Finally, Beristain and Zorrilla (2011) posited that consumers who perceive a store as a competent firm, with know-how and experience, may also perceive it as developing high-quality own brands.…”
Section: Store Social Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 Subjects ' perceptions of the company were assessed using six semantic differential scales. Three items measured expertise and three items measured trustworthiness.…”
Section: Corporate Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale was created based on the attribute-items identified in the previous phase, some of which were similar to others that had already been validated in academic literature for the measurement of perceived brand quality (Keller & D. A. Aaker, 1992), as well as the attitude towards the brand (Zinkhan, Locander, & Leigh, 1986), its personality (J. L. Aaker, 1997), or its degree of luxury (Wiedmann et al, 2007a;2007b;2009). The reliability of the scale was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha for the different dimensions of the considered image.…”
Section: Objective and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%