2013
DOI: 10.1080/00028487.2013.806349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Semichronic Thermal Stress on Physiological Indicators in Steelhead

Abstract: The physiological response of juvenile steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss to prolonged heat stress was examined by exposing replicated groups of fish to three different temperatures, 15, 23, and 25 • C, for 25 consecutive days followed by a 55-d recovery period at 15 • C. We found that at temperatures ≥ 25 • C, steelhead consumed significantly less food per day and had elevated feed conversion rates but experienced slower growth, reduced body size, lower body fat, and elevated heat shock protein (hsp) 70 levels rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower feed consumption likely contributed to the differences in weight between the treatment and control groups, with the treatment fish weighing significantly less at the end of the experiment, similar to the lower growth at higher temperatures as reported by Kammerer and Heppell (2013b) and Selong et al (2001). The FCR results were comparable to those for steelhead exposed to thermal stress (Kammerer and Heppell 2013b), with higher values indicating less allometric growth per gram of feed. Our weight results were confounded by the SGR results, which indicated no difference between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lower feed consumption likely contributed to the differences in weight between the treatment and control groups, with the treatment fish weighing significantly less at the end of the experiment, similar to the lower growth at higher temperatures as reported by Kammerer and Heppell (2013b) and Selong et al (2001). The FCR results were comparable to those for steelhead exposed to thermal stress (Kammerer and Heppell 2013b), with higher values indicating less allometric growth per gram of feed. Our weight results were confounded by the SGR results, which indicated no difference between the groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The pattern of reduced food consumption at warmer temperatures has been seen in several species, including the Burbot (Hardewig et al 2004), Dolly Varden Salvelinus malma (Takami et al 1997), Whitespotted Char S. leucomaenis (Takami et al 1997), steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss (Kammerer and Heppell 2013b), and Bull Trout S. confluentus (Selong et al 2001), and is potentially attributable to lower apparent digestibility at higher temperatures (Harwood 1979). The lower feed consumption likely contributed to the differences in weight between the treatment and control groups, with the treatment fish weighing significantly less at the end of the experiment, similar to the lower growth at higher temperatures as reported by Kammerer and Heppell (2013b) and Selong et al (2001). The FCR results were comparable to those for steelhead exposed to thermal stress (Kammerer and Heppell 2013b), with higher values indicating less allometric growth per gram of feed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Greater resilience in steelhead stems from several factors. First, steelhead inhabit streams warmer than those used by Chinook or coho salmon [61, 154, 155]. Compared to spring-run Chinook and sockeye salmon, steelhead also display greater mobility during migration, utilizing high-elevation, high-velocity, and hard-to-reach or ephemeral and intermittent stream habitats, as well as cool-water tributaries for temporary staging [156].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antioxidant enzyme activities and stress‐response gene expressions are popular indicators that are used for evaluating animals’ stress response to environmental changes. For example, antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase [SODs; enzyme number 1.15.1.1; IUBMB 1992], catalase [11.1.9], glutathione peroxidase [2.5.1.18], and glutathione transferase [2.5.1.18]) directly detoxify harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other compounds that are induced by environmental stress (Yu 1994; Halliwell and Gutteridge 1999; Lushchak and Bagnyukova 2006; Kammerer and Heppell 2013). Molecular chaperones, such as heat‐shock proteins (HSPs), have general protective functions in response to oxidative stress (Parsell and Lindquist 1993; Feder and Hofmann 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%