The Effects of Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy on Substance Use Abstinence

Chavarria, Jesus; Stevens, Edward B.; Jason, Leonard A.; Ferrari, Joseph R.

doi:10.1080/07347324.2012.718960

Cited by 57 publications

(43 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(54 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There was a positive and high correlation between the perceived self-regulatory efficacy scale for writing and academic self-efficacy scale. Obtaining a positive and significant correlation between the adapted scale and a scale used for criterion validity shows that the adapted scale has criterion validity (Guler 2012;Erkus, 2011) and this finding is consistent with the previous research findings (Chavarria, Stevens, Jason, & Ferrari, 2012;Ghonsooly & Ghanizade, 2011;Hodges, Stackpole-Hodges, & Cox, 2008).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Adaptation of Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale for Writing into Turkish Language

Çelikkaleli¹,

Yıldırım²

2015

IOJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research aimed to adapt perceived self-regulatory efficacy scale for writing to Turkish language. The data for factor analysis and reliability was obtained from a total of 450 undergraduate students (308 male, 142 female, age mean=20.82, SD=1.43) studying at a public university in Turkey's Mugla province. Additionally, for the criterion validity of the scale, another data was gathered from a total of 250 undergraduate students (154 male, 76 female age mean=20.89, SD=1.55). The scale, which is consisted of 25 items, revealed one-factor model and this factor explained 38% variance. Factor loading of the scale ranged from .18 to .74. Item-total correlations were from .16 to .69. Beside this, the internal consistency (Cronbach's Alpha=α) of the scale was .93 from the first sample and it was .90 from the second sample. The item analysis of 27% upper and lower group means calculation yielded a statistically significant "t value". In regard to the criterion validity of the scale, there was positive and significant relation between the adapted scale and academic self-efficacy scale.© 2015 IOJES. All rights reserved Keywords:1 Self-regulation, validity, reliability, efficacy Extended Summary PurposeThe aim of this study is to adapt the scale named perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing which was developed by Zimmerman and Bandura (1994) to Turkish culture. MethodThe data for factor analysis and reliability was obtained from a total of 450 undergraduate students (308 male, 142 female, age M=20.82, SD=1.43) studying at a public university in Turkey's Mugla province. For the test-retest reliability of the scale, the data was collected from 50 undergraduate students and for the language validity of the scale, the data was obtained from 36 undergraduate students. On the other hand, for the criterion validity of the scale, another set of data was collected from a total of 250 undergraduate students (154 male, 76 female age M=20. 89, SD=1.55). When the sample groups were formed, convenience sampling method was utilized. Perceived self-regulatory efficacy for writing and academic self-efficacy scales were used to collect the data.To test the construct validity of the scale, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were employed. While internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's Alpha α), test-retest correlation coefficient, Spearmen-Brown Split-Half correlation coefficient were used for the reliability of the scale, independent samples t-test was used to test the mean differences in the 27% upper and lower groups. In addition, sampling adequacy and Barlett Sphericity tests were used to discover whether the sampling was

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 82%

Adaptation of Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale for Writing into Turkish Language

Çelikkaleli¹,

Yıldırım²

2015

IOJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the purpose of this study, the lower score of the two measures was used for each participant. We chose to use the lower score because Oxford House residents are required to abstain from all types of drugs and alcohol, and whichever domain is the weakest link in abstinence self-efficacy is the domain most likely to lead to relapse (Chavarria et al 2012). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hope and Abstinence Self-Efficacy: Positive Predictors of Negative Affect in Substance Abuse Recovery

May

Hunter

Ferrari

et al. 2015

Community Ment Health J

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Goal-oriented thinking, including hope and self-efficacy, might play a constructive and integral role in the substance abuse recovery process, although such an effect may differ by race. The current study investigated hope and self-efficacy, specifically abstinence self-efficacy, as predictors of negative affect (i.e. depression and anxiety) in a longitudinal sample of men and women in substance abuse recovery who lived in sober living homes. We found hope agency and self-efficacy were related but not identical constructs; hope agency and self-efficacy predicted depressive and anxiety symptoms for individuals in recovery, yet these relationships were moderated by race. Theoretical and clinical implications for promoting positive affect among individuals in substance abuse recovery are discussed.

show abstract

“…The reliability estimates in terms of internal consistency for both the DASE and AASE have been shown to be excellent (Cronbach's alphas = .98 and .99, respectively). Research using binary logistic regression found that the prediction percentage between self-efficacy (measured by the DASE/AASE) and avoiding substance use was 66.1% (Chavarria et al 2012). Lastly, the Short-Form (SF-12) measure, adapted from the SF-36 (Ware, Kosinski & Gandek, 2001) was used in construct validation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring the Factor Structure of a Recovery Assessment Measure among Substance-Abusing Youth

Gonzales

Hernandez

Douglas

et al. 2015

Journal of Psychoactive Drugs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To date, the measurement of recovery in the field of substance abuse is limited. Youth recovery from substance abuse is an important area to consider given the complexities of such issues. The Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) has been validated with mental health patient populations, however its measurement characteristics have not been examined for individuals in substance abuse treatment. The current study explored the factor structure of the RAS with a sample of 80 substance abusing youth who participated in a pilot aftercare study (Mage 20.5, SD = 3.5; 71.3% male). Reliability analysis showed an internal consistency of α = .90 for the entire RAS measure among the youth sample. Results of exploratory factor analysis identified the following four factors: personal determination, skills for recovery, self-control in recovery, and social support/moving beyond recovery among the substance abusing youth sample. The RAS also demonstrated sound convergent and divergent validity in comparison to other validated measures of functioning, sobriety, and wellbeing. Collectively, results support that the RAS has adequate psychometric properties for measuring recovery among substance abusing youth.

show abstract

The Effects of Self-Regulation and Self-Efficacy on Substance Use Abstinence

Cited by 57 publications

References 37 publications

Adaptation of Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale for Writing into Turkish Language

Adaptation of Perceived Self-Regulatory Efficacy Scale for Writing into Turkish Language

Hope and Abstinence Self-Efficacy: Positive Predictors of Negative Affect in Substance Abuse Recovery

Exploring the Factor Structure of a Recovery Assessment Measure among Substance-Abusing Youth

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About