2006
DOI: 10.1080/17470910600985621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of self-involvement on attention, arousal, and facial expression during social interaction with virtual others: A psychophysiological study

Abstract: Social neuroscience has shed light on the underpinnings of understanding other minds. The current study investigated the effect of self-involvement during social interaction on attention, arousal, and facial expression. Specifically, we sought to disentangle the effect of being personally addressed from the effect of decoding the meaning of another person's facial expression. To this end, eye movements, pupil size, and facial electromyographic (EMG) activity were recorded while participants observed virtual ch… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
65
2
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
5
65
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our male participants did not show superior performance for a male's storytelling overall, but only when the gaze was direct. There is some evidence that motor resonance to facial expressions as measured by facial electromyography is stronger in the context of direct vs. averted gaze (Schrammel, Pannasch, Graupner, Mojzisch, & Velichkovsky, 2009;Soussignan et al, 2013) although this is not a consistent finding (see Mojzisch et al, 2006). In addition, in a brain imaging study, no effect of head and gaze direction was observed on the mirror neuron system activation (Schulte-Rüther, Markowitsch, Fink, & Piefke, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, our male participants did not show superior performance for a male's storytelling overall, but only when the gaze was direct. There is some evidence that motor resonance to facial expressions as measured by facial electromyography is stronger in the context of direct vs. averted gaze (Schrammel, Pannasch, Graupner, Mojzisch, & Velichkovsky, 2009;Soussignan et al, 2013) although this is not a consistent finding (see Mojzisch et al, 2006). In addition, in a brain imaging study, no effect of head and gaze direction was observed on the mirror neuron system activation (Schulte-Rüther, Markowitsch, Fink, & Piefke, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Note, however, that participants who did not believe that the avatar was controlled by another human were excluded from study I and not invited to study II. In addition, previous investigations demonstrate that using avatars is an adequate tool to study the processing of facebased social stimuli (25,54). Moreover, although JA processing represents an elegant tool to investigate basic social interaction behavior as represented by gaze contact, it cannot cover all facets of social interaction behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, likeable people look good, are friendly, and are useful, and all three contribute to an overall sense of attraction. Previous research on virtual characters has identified a number of other potentially important factors, including personality (Arellano, Verona & Perales, 2008), politeness and impoliteness (Campano & Sabouret, 2009), rapport (Gratch, Wang, Gerten, Fast & Duffy, 2007), directional attention (Mojzisch, Schilbach, Helmert, Pannasch, Velichovsky & Vogeley, 2006), the social dynamics of display (Ochs & Prendinger, 2010), and similarity/homophily (Jones, Pelham, Carvallo & Mirenberg, 2004). …”
Section: Real Feelings For Virtual People: Emotional Attachments and mentioning
confidence: 99%