The effects of roadside vegetation characteristics on local, near-road air quality

Abstract

Roadside vegetation has been shown to impact downwind, near-road air quality, with some studies identifying reductions in air pollution concentrations and others indicating increases in pollutant levels when vegetation is present. These widely contradictory results have resulted in confusion regarding the capability of vegetative barriers to mitigate near-road air pollution, which numerous studies have associated with significant adverse human health effects. Roadside vegetation studies have investigated the impact of many different types and conditions of vegetation barriers and urban forests, including preserved, existing vegetation stands usually consisting of mixtures of trees and shrubs or plantings of individual trees. A study was conducted along a highway with differing vegetation characteristics to identify if and how the changing characteristics affected downwind air quality. The results indicated that roadside vegetation needed to be of sufficient height, thickness, and coverage to achieve downwind air pollutant reductions. A vegetation stand which was highly porous and contained large gaps within the stand structure had increased downwind pollutant concentrations. These field study results were consistent with other studies that the roadside vegetation could lead to reductions in average, downwind pollutant concentrations by as much as 50% when this vegetation was thick with no gaps or openings. However, the presence of highly porous vegetation with gaps resulted in similar or sometimes higher concentrations than measured in a clearing with no vegetation. The combination of air quality and meteorological measurements indicated that the vegetation affects downwind pollutant concentrations through attenuation of meteorological and vehicle-induced turbulence as air passes through the vegetation, enhanced mixing as portions of the traffic pollution plume are blocked and forced over the vegetation, and through particulate deposition onto leaf and branch surfaces. Computational fluid dynamic modeling highlighted that density of the vegetation barrier affects pollutant levels, with a leaf area density of 3.0 m 2 m −3 or higher needed to ensure downwind pollutant reductions for airborne particulate matter. These results show that roadside bushes and trees can be preserved or planted along highways and other localized pollution sources to mitigate air quality and human health impacts near the source if the planting adheres to important characteristics of height, thickness, and Highlights

Designing vegetation barriers for urban air pollution abatement: a practical review for appropriate plant species selection

“…Given that the LAD of most naturally occurring vegetation is 1-5 m 2 /m 3 102 , and in line with findings by Ghasemian et al 54 , a LAD of~4 m 2 /m 3 may be recommended. Indeed, such a value would be in agreement with recent findings from CFD modelling undertaken by Deshmukh et al 53 , which suggested that a LAD of 3 m 2 /m 3 or higher is needed for downwind PM reductions. However, it should be noted that the density of a species that forms part of a barrier under active management may differ considerably from that exhibited by the same species under 'natural' or comparatively unmanaged conditions.…”

“…For example, highly porous (lowdensity) vegetation barriers can reduce wind speed as it penetrates gaps, potentially resulting in pollutant accumulation downwind (i.e. within and beyond the barrier) 34,53 . Conversely, very low-porosity vegetation can limit pollution removal by restricting infiltration and forcing air pollutants to flow above and around the barrier or to recirculate and accumulate on the upwind or source side 29,54 .…”

The associations between social, built and geophysical environment and age-specific dementia mortality among older adults in a high-density Asian city

“…injuries). Second, vegetation can reduce air pollution (Deshmukh et al, 2019;Przybysz et al, 2019). This may be a modi er regarding the effect of regional air pollution on dementia mortality.…”

Combining Dispersion Modeling and Monitoring Data for Community-Scale Air Quality Characterization

“…The mobile monitoring utilized an instrumented electric vehicle recording 1-s ultrafine particulate matter number count (UFP), black carbon (BC), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) data. Mobile monitoring used a combination of the Geospatial Monitoring of Air Pollution (GMAP) electric vehicle (Ford Focus) and a stationary sport utility vehicle (SUV; Ford Excursion) outfitted with fast-response air monitoring instruments which have been employed in previous studies [14]. The vehicles have separate, onboard solar and battery supplies powering the air monitoring instruments.…”