2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.01.130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of rice straw biochar on indigenous microbial community and enzymes activity in heavy metal-contaminated sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
80
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 292 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
9
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Urease activity change in response to treatment appears to result from fertilizer incorporation. Incorporation of fertilizer had a significant effect on the soil urease activity compared to when biochar was added alone, suggesting that the addition of urea in the fertilization regime enhanced the activity of many enzymes catalyzing N. However, single application of biochar without fertilization still showed significant difference with the control soil and this result is consistent with urease and phosphodiesterase activity data obtained in many previous studies [44][45][46]. However, a significant difference of phosphodiesterase activity due to the phosphate addition in the biochar amended soil co-applied with fertilizer (FPK and FRH) was not observed.…”
Section: Effect Of Biochar On Soil Microbial Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Urease activity change in response to treatment appears to result from fertilizer incorporation. Incorporation of fertilizer had a significant effect on the soil urease activity compared to when biochar was added alone, suggesting that the addition of urea in the fertilization regime enhanced the activity of many enzymes catalyzing N. However, single application of biochar without fertilization still showed significant difference with the control soil and this result is consistent with urease and phosphodiesterase activity data obtained in many previous studies [44][45][46]. However, a significant difference of phosphodiesterase activity due to the phosphate addition in the biochar amended soil co-applied with fertilizer (FPK and FRH) was not observed.…”
Section: Effect Of Biochar On Soil Microbial Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Ahmad et al (2016) observed that biochar produced at a low temperature could increase the abundance of fungi, Gram-positive, and Gram-negative bacteria, actinobacteria, and actinomycetes in a Pb-and As-contaminated soil. As a result, the capacity of biochar to change the soil pH, organic matter content, and available nutrients has a great impact on soil microbial activity in contaminated soils amended with biochar (Beesley et al 2010(Beesley et al , 2011Huang et al 2017).…”
Section: Response Of Soil Microbes To Biochar Amendment In Contaminatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduced bacterial communities at the early stages can be attributed to the accelerated microbial succession caused by biochar-induced microbial activities and growth. As a result, the dominant microbes may occupy the space and consume the nutrients rapidly which lead to inhibit the other microorganism (Huang et al 2017). On the other hand, reduction of metal toxicity caused by biochar and the changes in environmental conditions over the time could account for the increased bacterial community at the later stages (Chen et al 2017b).…”
Section: Response Of Soil Microbes To Biochar Amendment In Contaminatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these shortcomings, great efforts have been committed to develop peroxidase mimetics. Among them, many peroxidase mimetics, such as porphyrin, hemin, cyclodextrin, and hematin, have been successfully developed and applied to H 2 O 2 detection . Since it was reported first that Fe 3 O 4 magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) possessed intrinsic peroxidase‐like activity in 2007, thus opening the door for the development of nanomaterial‐based peroxidase‐like.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%