2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2019.102382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of repetitive bouts of a fatiguing exertion (with breaks) on the slope of EMG measures of localized muscle fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Localized muscle fatigue was evaluated by calculating the change in median frequency (MF) of the EMG spectrum to lower frequency (Lindstrom et al, 1970). Previously studies have confirmed that median frequency measures could be used as indicators of local muscle fatigue and showed a trend of decrease when muscles were fatigue (Li et al, 2014; Sarker & Mirka, 2020; Tetteh et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Localized muscle fatigue was evaluated by calculating the change in median frequency (MF) of the EMG spectrum to lower frequency (Lindstrom et al, 1970). Previously studies have confirmed that median frequency measures could be used as indicators of local muscle fatigue and showed a trend of decrease when muscles were fatigue (Li et al, 2014; Sarker & Mirka, 2020; Tetteh et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…That being said, there are moments where the subject managed to control the fatigue during the experiment, as shown in Figure 9 where the RMS value on both muscles decreased at certain ends. On the other hand, most researchers agreed that a decreased value of MDF on a muscles contraction shows that the muscles are experiencing fatigue [16][17][18]. In Table 1, there are several moments where the subject begins to experience fatigue on Supraspinatus such as during the 5 th end where the MDF value drop significantly to 6.45E-02 compared to 1.00E-01 on the 4 th end at Supraspinatus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical analyses such as Root Mean Square (RMS) and Median Frequency (MDF) were used in measuring muscle fatigue conditions, as recommended by Zhou et al [13]. Nur et al [14], and Ayaz et al [15], preferred RMS to analyze and interpret the data as RMS calculation gives the best insight on the amplitude of the EMG signal with a waveform that easily be interpreted while Sarker and Mirka [16], Mas'As et al [17], and Phinyomark et al [18] preferred MDF as it is frequently considered as the gold standard for muscle fatigue assessment with sEMG signal due to its versatility to analyze both static and dynamic muscle contraction. Alhaag et al [19], in their recent research, used both RMS and MDF to identify the fatigue associated with different task complexity during maintenance operations while Borges et al [20] also used these two statistical methods to find the fatigue level of novice and elite archers on flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS).…”
Section: Figure 1 Flow Chart Of Experiments Conductedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we argue that it is a compelling relative metric to measure or identify properties in the muscle in response to fatigue, or anti-fatiguing, due to repetitive exercise. Thus, the change in the ratio with respect to time (i.e., the slope of EMG vs. time) can show changes to motor unit recruitment in the muscle over time ( 6 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neuromuscular activity during muscle training has shown to be correlated to contraction response, specifically in the identification of motor recruitment changes and fatigue. Commonly used biopotential measurement systems such as surface electromyograms (EMG) have demonstrated use in these findings, specifically in identifying the patterns of contractile amplitudes and frequencies during a fatiguing exercise (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). For example, fatiguing muscles show an increase in EMG contractile amplitude that correlates to the number of recruited motor neurons, as well as a low-frequency shift in the raw EMG signal (7)(8)(9)(10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%