2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03448.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of refractive index heterogeneity within kidney tissue on multiphoton fluorescence excitation microscopy

Abstract: Summary Although multiphoton fluorescence excitation microscopy has improved the depth at which useful fluorescence images can be collected in biological tissues, the reach of multiphoton fluorescence excitation microscopy is nonetheless limited by tissue scattering and spherical aberration. Scattering can be reduced in fixed samples by mounting in a medium whose refractive index closely matches that of the fixed material. Using optical ‘clearing’, the effects of refractive index heterogeneity on signal attenu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Residual differences in refractive index lead to scattering and aberrations that degrade the point-spread function at depth. Axial resolution is affected most strongly, particularly when using high numerical aperture objectives, reducing clarity of optical sections and three dimensional reconstructions [8]. The alternative clearing method known as Clarity that employs hydrogel scaffolds and electrophoresis to remove lipids [9] affords excellent index matching, but is too labor intensive and tissue altering for practical clinical histology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual differences in refractive index lead to scattering and aberrations that degrade the point-spread function at depth. Axial resolution is affected most strongly, particularly when using high numerical aperture objectives, reducing clarity of optical sections and three dimensional reconstructions [8]. The alternative clearing method known as Clarity that employs hydrogel scaffolds and electrophoresis to remove lipids [9] affords excellent index matching, but is too labor intensive and tissue altering for practical clinical histology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the “optical transparency” of a given organ, it strongly depends on its homogeneity. Indeed, light undergoes scattering when crossing the interface between component of the tissues with different refractive indexes 38 , 39 . It is also generally true that highly vascularized tissues are less optically transparent due to the light absorption and scattering of the red blood cells.…”
Section: Imaging Modality and Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a rigorous side by side comparison of the various organs has never been performed, it has been empirically determined that tissues such as the brain are optically more suitable for IVM than skeletal muscle, skin, liver or kidney. Notably, in the last couple of years several approaches have been used to “clear” tissues by using special solutions that either reduce the difference between the refractive index in the various tissue layers 38 , 39 or make them optically transparent 40 . This approach has enabled imaging neurons labeled with genetically encoded fluorescent proteins up to 8 mm below the surface with an unprecedented resolution (Fig.…”
Section: Imaging Modality and Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further advantage of using near-infrared wavelengths, instead of ultraviolet light, for fluorescence excitation is the reduction of scattering and increase in imaging penetration depth in the sample from approximately 20 µm to 500-600 µm. However, in the kidney, the maximal penetration depth is approximately 150 µm owing to substantial scattering of emission photons from the high refractory index and heterogeneity of kidney tissue (Young et al, 2011a;Young et al, 2011b). A useful application of FLIM in conjunction with MPM in the kidney is measuring the fluorescence lifetime of NAD(P)H. NAD(P)H lifetime measurements are widely used for metabolic and redox imaging in vitro and in vivo (Bird et al, 2005;Skala et al, 2007a;Skala et al, 2007b;Leite-Silva et al, 2013;Thorling et al, 2013).…”
Section: Figure 51: Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further advantage of using near-infrared wavelengths, instead of ultraviolet light, for fluorescence excitation is the reduction of scattering and increase in imaging penetration depth in the sample from approximately 20 µm to 500-600 µm. However, in the kidney, the maximal penetration depth is approximately 150 µm owing to substantial scattering of emission photons from the high refractory index and heterogeneity of kidney tissue (Young et al, 2011a;Young et al, 2011b). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%