2008
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200809387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of ram-pressure stripping on the internal kinematics of simulated spiral galaxies

Abstract: Aims. We investigate the influence of ram-pressure stripping on the internal gas kinematics of simulated spiral galaxies. Additional emphasis is put on the question of how the resulting distortions of the gaseous disc are visible in the rotation curve and/or the full 2D velocity field of galaxies at different redshifts. Methods. A Milky-Way type disc galaxy is modelled in combined N-body/hydrodynamic simulations with prescriptions for cooling, star formation, stellar feedback, and galactic winds. This model ga… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

10
48
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
10
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since these rotation curves trace the gaseous disk of a galaxy, asymmetries in such a curve can be a measure for kinematic distortions due to environmental effects like ram-pressure stripping, mergers, galaxy harassment or tidal interactions with the cluster potential. Kronberger et al (2008) find in combined N-body/hydrodynamic simulations that the collision-less stellar disk is not affected by ram pressure and only the gaseous component shows disturbed kinematics. Asymmetries in the gas kinematics combined with a lack of distortions in the stellar disk could therefore be a strong indicator for ram-pressure stripping.…”
Section: Kinematic Analysis Of Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since these rotation curves trace the gaseous disk of a galaxy, asymmetries in such a curve can be a measure for kinematic distortions due to environmental effects like ram-pressure stripping, mergers, galaxy harassment or tidal interactions with the cluster potential. Kronberger et al (2008) find in combined N-body/hydrodynamic simulations that the collision-less stellar disk is not affected by ram pressure and only the gaseous component shows disturbed kinematics. Asymmetries in the gas kinematics combined with a lack of distortions in the stellar disk could therefore be a strong indicator for ram-pressure stripping.…”
Section: Kinematic Analysis Of Galaxiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…But also the influence of "nurture" can be important. Both Galaxy-galaxy interactions, such as tidal interactions, major/minor mergers, or harassment (Moore et al 1996), and galaxy-cluster interactions, such as ram-pressure stripping (Gunn & Gott 1972;Kronberger et al 2008) due to the ICM (Intra-cluster medium), halo truncation (Balogh et al 2000;Bekki et al 2001), or gas compression (Tonnesen & Bryan 2009;Byrd & Valtonen 1990) can play crucial roles in the evolution of galaxies. To decouple the different effects of environment on galaxy evolution, it is necessary to analyse a variety of galaxy properties, such as kinematics, spectral energy distributions (SEDs), morphologies, stellar masses, or star-formation rates (SFRs) over a wide range of environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several physical processes can disturb this regular behaviour. On the one hand, kinematic perturbations can be induced by external factors, such as ram-pressure stripping (e.g., Kronberger et al 2008) or galactic mergers (e.g., Naab & Burkert 2003). On the other hand, kinematic departures from regular rotation can be due to internal instabilities, such as spiral arms or bars (Binney & Tremaine 2008;Sellwood 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a fraction of the total flux at all wavelengths is lost and, to date, no recipe to correct for this effect has proved satisfactory, although several studies of aperture effects have been carried out (e.g. Brinchmann et al 2004;Ellis et al 2005;Kewley et al 2005;Salim et al 2007;Kronberger et al 2008;Gerssen et al 2012;Zahid et al 2013;Hopkins et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%