2020
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e19-09-0515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of proliferation status and cell cycle phase on the responses of single cells to chemotherapy

Abstract: DNA-damaging chemotherapy often leaves residual tumor cells. Combining single-cell long-term live imaging with information theory, we found an unexpected effect: highly proliferative cells were more likely to arrest than to die, whereas more slowly proliferating cells showed a higher probability of death.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding morphology, proliferation, and migration potential, our results from cell lysates are following the studies where cells went into autophagy or senescence [ 3 , 44 ] but we also found the same inhibitory effect of cell lysates on fibroblasts. This is in contradiction to these reports [ 57 , 58 ]. Perhaps this difference of effect can be attributed to different fibroblast cell lines or the concentrations of cell lysates used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding morphology, proliferation, and migration potential, our results from cell lysates are following the studies where cells went into autophagy or senescence [ 3 , 44 ] but we also found the same inhibitory effect of cell lysates on fibroblasts. This is in contradiction to these reports [ 57 , 58 ]. Perhaps this difference of effect can be attributed to different fibroblast cell lines or the concentrations of cell lysates used in these studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…For WJ-FBSCM, we also found an inhibitory effect at 24HR from some samples. This initial decrease can be explained by the presence of heterogeneous cells at different phases of the cell cycle and the cell's response to arrest or die or proliferate in response to the treatment [ 57 ]. Both concentrations of BM-FBSCM and WJ-FBSCM (100% and 50%) showed significant inhibition in comparison to FBS control at 96HR and 120HR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without such capability, studies of these events will always be limited to taking a "snapshot" of what is in fact a highly dynamic process, as clearly illustrated in the abovementioned in vitro studies by Rohnalter et al [92], who demonstrated the markedly time-dependent fate of individual cancer cells in cisplatin-treated cultures. Another level of complexity that will ultimately need to be addressed relates to ongoing research into the cellular dynamics of individual DDR components in single cells treated with DNA-damaging agents and how these multiple signals are integrated and translated into cell-fate decisions such as survival, death/apoptosis and dormancy/cytostasis [45,[139][140][141].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in TMZ-exposed glioma cells, the pre-treatment with LAV-BPIFB4, by reducing senescence ( Figure 3 C–F) and probably by restoring the ability of these cells to reenter the cell cycle (as preliminarily documented in Hek-293 transfected with LAV-BPIFB4 isoforms, unpublished data ) may cause the TMZ-induced toxicity, as suggested by the higher apoptotic rate induced by LAV-BPIFB4 co-treatment ( Figure 3 G,H). In this context, Granada A. et al recently reported the unexpected effect of proliferation status in regulating responses to cisplatin and suggest that slowly proliferating cells within tumors, like those reentering the cell cycle, may be acutely vulnerable to chemotherapy [ 52 ]. In the same way, the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been strongly associated with proliferation of ER + /HER2 − breast cancers [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%