2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of professional development on the attitudes, knowledge and skills for data-driven decision making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, self-reflection might boost teachers' expectation to be efficacious in judging students fairly on merits and not on appearance. With practice, this might transfer to one's efficacy beliefs about the capacity to apply data-driven decision making, aimed at improving one's teaching (Bandura 1997;Schwarzer and Hallum 2008;Staman et al 2014). Teaching pre-service teachers about the factors that might play a role in judgment formation such as stereotypes, attitudes, and particular student characteristics can help to increase their awareness of biasing factors (Pendry et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, self-reflection might boost teachers' expectation to be efficacious in judging students fairly on merits and not on appearance. With practice, this might transfer to one's efficacy beliefs about the capacity to apply data-driven decision making, aimed at improving one's teaching (Bandura 1997;Schwarzer and Hallum 2008;Staman et al 2014). Teaching pre-service teachers about the factors that might play a role in judgment formation such as stereotypes, attitudes, and particular student characteristics can help to increase their awareness of biasing factors (Pendry et al 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participants included the school leader, academic coach, and teachers of Grades 1 to 3 in the first intervention year and the school leader, academic coach, and teachers of Grades 4 to 6 in the second year in the eastern part of The Netherlands (Staman, Visscher, & Luyten, 2014). Based on the results of the Focus I intervention, and experiences with these schools in combination with insights from the literature on professional development and comprehensive school reform, the intervention was optimized and implemented in 53 schools during the 2011 to 2013 academic years as the Focus II intervention (Van Geel, .…”
Section: The Dbdm Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before DBDM was introduced, often only school leaders and academic coaches used data from a SMS to analyze student achievement. Staman, Visscher and Luyten (2014) found that initial scores for school leaders and internal coaches were significantly higher than for teachers, a finding we expect to replicate (hypothesis 2). Also, it was expected that data literacy of educators with a master's degree would initially be higher, since they would be more familiar with statistical concepts and graphical data representations as compared to educators with higher education (hypothesis 3), which is the required level of education for teachers in the Netherlands.…”
Section: Research Question and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Based on the results of another, quite similar intervention project, it is known that this intervention can lead to a considerable improvement in the correct interpretation of student achievement data (Staman et al, 2014). However, especially teachers still proved to make some misinterpretations after the intervention.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%