1989
DOI: 10.1080/00207548908942575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of product structure and sequencing rule on assembly shop performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have attempted to test a number of rules which performed well in studies of assembly environments, as well as several rules developed speci® cally for a remanufacturing shop. Job due date based rules have performed consistently well with respect to a number of performance measures in many studies (Goodwin and Goodwin 1982, Goodwin and Weeks 1984, Fry et al 1989, Philipoom et al 1989 …”
Section: Priority Dispatch Rulesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We have attempted to test a number of rules which performed well in studies of assembly environments, as well as several rules developed speci® cally for a remanufacturing shop. Job due date based rules have performed consistently well with respect to a number of performance measures in many studies (Goodwin and Goodwin 1982, Goodwin and Weeks 1984, Fry et al 1989, Philipoom et al 1989 …”
Section: Priority Dispatch Rulesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The study was limited to the performance of due date based priority dispatching rules (Philipoom et al 1989). Fry et al (1989) found that there were statistically signi® cant di erences between product structure types. Three basic clases of product structure;¯at, tall and complex, were examined in a mixed environment with a mix of dispatching rules.…”
Section: Product Structure Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors applied recursively stage by stage the approximate expression for two stage assembly developed by Song et al (2002). The method is evaluated by comparing it with extensions to existing heuristic methods TWKCP (total work on the critical path) and SLKCP (total work with slack on the critical path) to estimate the product due dates for assemblies (Fry et al 1989, Smith et al 1995, Roman and Valle 1996. Simulation examples verify the effectiveness of this method.…”
Section: Assembly Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Reeja and Rajendran (2000a,b) came up with the operation synchronization date (OSD) rule, and found the rule to be better than the RRP and IR rules for tie-breaking when the TWKR rule is the primary one. The effect of product structures on the performance of the dispatching rules (Fry, Oliff, Minor, & Leong, 1989) and dynamic assignment of due-date without the use of parameters (Adam, Bertrand, Morehead, & Surkis, 1993) are other important contributions in the assembly job-shop environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%