2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00815-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of pressure- versus volume-controlled ventilation on ventilator work of breathing

Abstract: Background Measurement of work of breathing (WOB) during mechanical ventilation is essential to assess the status and progress of intensive care patients. Increasing ventilator WOB is known as a risk factor for ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). In addition, the minimization of WOB is crucial to facilitate the weaning process. Several studies have assessed the effects of varying inspiratory flow waveforms on the patient’s WOB during assisted ventilation, but there are few studies on the different effect of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring the work of breathing is necessary to evaluate the status of patients during the use of mechanical controlled ventilation [19]. The work of breathing, the integral of the product of volume and pressure, was also compared between the VCV and Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.14/September-2021/34.pdf PCV groups.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the work of breathing is necessary to evaluate the status of patients during the use of mechanical controlled ventilation [19]. The work of breathing, the integral of the product of volume and pressure, was also compared between the VCV and Available at www.veterinaryworld.org/Vol.14/September-2021/34.pdf PCV groups.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCV improves arterial oxygenation and decreases peak airway pressure because it decelerates inspiratory low. However, PCV has some limitations, including insufficient ventilation and excessive ventilation [3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%