2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-016-2264-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of prenatal HIV exposure on language functioning in Kenyan children: establishing an evaluative framework

Abstract: BackgroundHIV infection has been associated with impaired language development in prenatally exposed children. Although most of the burden of HIV occurs in sub-Saharan Africa, there have not been any comprehensive studies of HIV exposure on multiple aspects of language development using instruments appropriate for the population.MethodsWe compared language development in children exposed to HIV in utero to community controls (N = 262, 8–30 months) in rural Kenya, using locally adapted and validated communicati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from this South African birth cohort show that HIV-exposed uninfected children had poorer language outcomes at 24 months, but not at 6 months, when compared with HIV-unexposed children. To our knowledge, this is the largest longitudinal study to report delayed language development in both receptive and expressive domains in HIV-exposed uninfected children in South Africa, building on previous literature18, 19, 20, 21 suggesting that language might be impaired in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The results from this South African birth cohort show that HIV-exposed uninfected children had poorer language outcomes at 24 months, but not at 6 months, when compared with HIV-unexposed children. To our knowledge, this is the largest longitudinal study to report delayed language development in both receptive and expressive domains in HIV-exposed uninfected children in South Africa, building on previous literature18, 19, 20, 21 suggesting that language might be impaired in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although studies have reported language deficits or late language emergence in HEU vs. HUU children [7,10,33], our cohort showed no difference. However, language delay in HEU infants may not be evident as early as 12 months of age [34]. Seven HEU infants (12%) and one (2.6%) HUU infant reached the ADBB threshold for social withdrawal behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…HUU children , our cohort showed no difference. However, language delay in HEU infants may not be evident as early as 12 months of age .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The forms of validity that have been tested in earlier applications of vocabulary measures among young children include establishing their relationship with age, SES (Luoni et al, 2015), non-verbal reasoning (Luoni et al, 2015;Storms, Saerens, & Deyn, 2004), reading skills (Luoni et al, 2015;Nation & Snowling, 2004), word production (Vogt et al, 2015), and clinical outcomes (Alcock, Abubakar, Newton, & Holding, 2016;Alcock, Holding, Mung'ala-Odera, & Newton, 2008). The fact that there are few studies reported from SSA demonstrates that much more effort is required in the validation of vocabulary measures that will be responsive to the cultural and language diversity in this context.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%