1978
DOI: 10.3758/bf03336783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of preexperimental diet upon reward magnitude effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, such factors as satiation (Campbell et aI., 1972), single-vs. multiplepellet rewards (Daly, 1972;McCain, 1969), rate of approach to asymptote (McHose & Moore, 1976), preexperimental diet (prytula, Davis, & Voorhees, 1978), and the particular segment of the instrumental response chain that is measured or reported (Davis et aI., 1976) have been shown to be related to the development and/or collapse of reward magnitude effects. In reviewing these apparently divergent results, as well as 11 large-vs. small-reward comparisons from their own laboratory, McHose and Moore (1976) note one consistent point of agreement: The rate of approach to asymptote appears to be positively related to reward magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, such factors as satiation (Campbell et aI., 1972), single-vs. multiplepellet rewards (Daly, 1972;McCain, 1969), rate of approach to asymptote (McHose & Moore, 1976), preexperimental diet (prytula, Davis, & Voorhees, 1978), and the particular segment of the instrumental response chain that is measured or reported (Davis et aI., 1976) have been shown to be related to the development and/or collapse of reward magnitude effects. In reviewing these apparently divergent results, as well as 11 large-vs. small-reward comparisons from their own laboratory, McHose and Moore (1976) note one consistent point of agreement: The rate of approach to asymptote appears to be positively related to reward magnitude.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%