The effects of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on posterolateral corner structures under gait- and squat-loading conditions

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the current study was to analyse the effects of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) deficiency on forces of the posterolateral corner structure and on tibiofemoral (TF) and patellofemoral (PF) contact force under dynamic-loading conditions.MethodsA subject-specific knee model was validated using a passive flexion experiment, electromyography data, muscle activation, and previous experimental studies. The simulation was performed on the musculoskeletal models with and without PCL deficiency using a novel force-dependent kinematics method under gait- and squat-loading conditions, followed by probabilistic analysis for material uncertain to be considered.ResultsComparison of predicted passive flexion, posterior drawer kinematics and muscle activation with experimental measurements showed good agreement. Forces of the posterolateral corner structure, and TF and PF contact forces increased with PCL deficiency under gait- and squat-loading conditions. The rate of increase in PF contact force was the greatest during the squat-loading condition. The TF contact forces increased on both medial and lateral compartments during gait-loading conditions. However, during the squat-loading condition, the medial TF contact force tended to increase, while the lateral TF contact forces decreased. The posterolateral corner structure, which showed the greatest increase in force with deficiency of PCL under both gait- and squat-loading conditions, was the popliteus tendon (PT).ConclusionPCL deficiency is a factor affecting the variability of force on the PT in dynamic-loading conditions, and it could lead to degeneration of the PF joint.Cite this article: K-T. Kang, Y-G. Koh, M. Jung, J-H. Nam, J. Son, Y.H. Lee, S-J. Kim, S-H. Kim. The effects of posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on posterolateral corner structures under gait- and squat-loading conditions: A computational knee model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:31–42. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.61.BJR-2016-0184.R1.

Biomechanical influence of deficient posterolateral corner structures on knee joint kinematics: A computational study

“…In order to assess the predictive accuracy of the model, the predicted activations for major muscles were compared with their respective EMG signals. Such a method has been well explained in previous studies . In addition, external rotation torque tests for rotational laxity under an intact and deficiency of PLC structures conditions with 5 Nm torque at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion were compared to previous experimental study for additional validation .…”

“…The PFL was modified so that it was connected with the popliteus muscle. This method has been well described in our previous study …”

Biomechanical effect of a lateral hinge fracture for a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: finite element study

“…An existing, previously validated, finite element (FE) model for the knee joint was used in this study [24][25][26]. Radiographic data from the knee joint of a 36-year-old male weighing 80 kg and 178 cm in height were acquired using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).…”

Computational analysis of customized cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty restoration of native knee joint biomechanics

“…A conservative ankle force of 50 N and hamstring forces of 10 N were constantly exerted with respect to a linearly increasing force with a maximum of approximately 600 N and 90° flexion of the quadriceps actuators in the TKA model under the first loading condition (33). A proportional-integral-derivative controller was incorporated into the computational model to allow for the control of the quadriceps in a manner similar to that in the experiment (34). The computational analysis was performed with force controls to both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint motions with respect to the compressive load applied to the femoral component.…”

“…The computational analysis was performed with force controls to both the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint motions with respect to the compressive load applied to the femoral component. A proportional-integral-derivative controller was incorporated into the computational model to allow for the control of the quadriceps in a manner similar to that in the experiment (34). Furthermore, anterior-posterior (AP) load and internal-external (IE) rotation were applied to the PE insert, and varus-valgus rotation in the medial-lateral was controlled by the ankle joint followed by quadriceps force attached to the patellar button (35)(36)(37)(38).…”