2006
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2006.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of place of articulation and vowel height in the acquisition of English aspirated stops by Spanish speakers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An analysis of the VOT durations revealed that average VOT values as a function of PoA of the stop consonant and vowel quality of the following vowel conformed to VOT values reported in the literature (e.g. Flege, Frieda, Walley, & Randazza, 1998;Yavaş & Wildermuth, 2006). That is, the further back in the oral cavity the stop closure occurred, the longer its VOT was (/p/</t/</k/).…”
Section: Production Of Voiceless Oral Stopssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An analysis of the VOT durations revealed that average VOT values as a function of PoA of the stop consonant and vowel quality of the following vowel conformed to VOT values reported in the literature (e.g. Flege, Frieda, Walley, & Randazza, 1998;Yavaş & Wildermuth, 2006). That is, the further back in the oral cavity the stop closure occurred, the longer its VOT was (/p/</t/</k/).…”
Section: Production Of Voiceless Oral Stopssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The target words had a pre-vocalic voiceless oral stop in the onset of a word-initial stressed syllable (Table 1). Because VOT varies with the PoA of the stop consonant (/p/</t/</k/) and the quality (high vs. nonhigh) of the following vowel (Yavaş & Wildermuth, 2006), the 12 target words in Spanish and in English included four tokens of each target oral stop (3 PoAs  4 tokens) and half of these stops appeared before a high vowel and half before a non-high vowel (/i/ and /a/ in Spanish and /iː/ and /ae/ in English). PoA differences in VOT in English stops appear to be relevant for Spanish-speaking learners of English because they may realise English stops with varying degrees of accuracy as a function of the size of the VOT difference between English and Spanish stops, which will be larger for velar stops, for example, than for labial stops.…”
Section: Materials and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/k/) often display longer values than labial (/p/) and dental (/t/) stops (e.g. Yavaş & Wildermuth, 2006), the cut-off value for /k/ was established at 40 ms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alfa, São Paulo, 59 (1): 2015 minimal pairs (bit -pit; dick -tick; gill -kill), each pair starting with a different place of articulation, followed by a high vowel (YAVAS;WILDERMUTH, 2006). In order to guarantee the quality of the audio stimuli, each speaker was asked to record their word list three times, so that the best tokens could be chosen for the perception tests.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%