The effects of physical contact and decision type on moral decision making: A study of harm to save moral behavior

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between physical contact and decision type in predicting "harm to save" behavior. Participants were assigned to making either a judgment or a choice involving moral dilemmas. All participants were presented with dilemmas that either required or did not require having physical contact with potential victims. Participants were asked to decide whether to sacrifice fewer people to save more (utilitarian responses) or not to do so and thus more people would die (deontological responses). The study sample included 345 participants who completed a set of self-report measures. Results indicated an interaction between physical contact and decision type. In the choice condition only, participants reported significantly less utilitarian responses to the dilemmas that required having physical contact with the person to be harmed than to dilemmas that did not require physical contact. This difference was not found in the judgment condition. These results contribute to a greater understanding of the nature and potential malleability of human morality.

Exploring the Relationship between Moral Decision-Making and Emotional Intelligence

“…This tendency is evident in discussions surrounding healthcare policies and social welfare programs, where the balance between individual freedoms and collective well-being is often debated. According to Smith & Jones (2019), 55% of British respondents prioritize a balance between individual rights and social obligations in moral decision-making scenarios.…”