1978
DOI: 10.3758/bf03204256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of peripheral and central fixation on a Poggendorff-like vernier alignment task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(21 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we had found no P-bias in this condition, eccentricity would have been a plausible explanation. However, Wenderoth, White, and Beh (1978) have shown that there is little effect of fixation positions on the perceptual Poggendorff effect, and this agrees with our finding that there is still a P-bias in the FP3 condition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If we had found no P-bias in this condition, eccentricity would have been a plausible explanation. However, Wenderoth, White, and Beh (1978) have shown that there is little effect of fixation positions on the perceptual Poggendorff effect, and this agrees with our finding that there is still a P-bias in the FP3 condition.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6 caption. The figure attempts to illustrate the effect described by Wenderoth et al, (1978). The 45 deg pointer appears to point lower than the dot on the right (the P-bias) but to be collinear with the dot on the left.…”
Section: Experiments 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greist and Grier (1977) report that the Poggendorff illusion was unaffected by horizontal displacements, but it disappeared when the stimulus was vertically displaced from the centre of fixation. Wenderoth, White, and Beh (1978) however, could not replicate the latter effect, nor the finding of Novak (1966). It can be therefore said that there is mixedevidence that horizontal displacements of the Poggendorff display affect its strength as an illusion -from which it could be concluded that there is no reason to suspect that the angle-of-intersection biases of the slalom illusion, if indeed they share a similar root cause, would be affected.…”
Section: Effects Of Stimulus Eccentricitymentioning
confidence: 86%