1994
DOI: 10.2307/130823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Partible Inheritance: Gentry Families and the State in Muscovy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, partible inheritance practices facilitated another set of historical occurrences, for it: condemned the Muscovite nobility to a servile status before the Tsar (Kivelson 1994); set‐up long‐lasting nicknames and kinship groupings above the level of household in Tory Island (post‐famine Ireland) (Breen 1982); offered Germans access to cash and collateral services in mid‐nineteenth century Hesse‐Cassel (Wegge 1999); co‐existed with seasonal (as opposed to permanent) migration and customs of local domestic industry in nineteenth century European peasant families (Habakkuk 1955); destroyed the eighteenth century English small farmer (yeoman) as a social class through a surfeit of mortgages/debts incurred to provide for the non‐inheritors (Thompson 1976); led to the liquidation of English family businesses in earlyindustrial Stockport after the death of their Victorian middle‐class proprietors whose wills were mostly concerned with providing a secure (possibly rentier income but also mobile and specialised capital) income for their offspring (Owens 2002); linked to lower co‐residence rates in present‐day southern Spanish regions. (Holdsworth et al.…”
Section: Population Density Regional Inheritance Practices and Farmementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, partible inheritance practices facilitated another set of historical occurrences, for it: condemned the Muscovite nobility to a servile status before the Tsar (Kivelson 1994); set‐up long‐lasting nicknames and kinship groupings above the level of household in Tory Island (post‐famine Ireland) (Breen 1982); offered Germans access to cash and collateral services in mid‐nineteenth century Hesse‐Cassel (Wegge 1999); co‐existed with seasonal (as opposed to permanent) migration and customs of local domestic industry in nineteenth century European peasant families (Habakkuk 1955); destroyed the eighteenth century English small farmer (yeoman) as a social class through a surfeit of mortgages/debts incurred to provide for the non‐inheritors (Thompson 1976); led to the liquidation of English family businesses in earlyindustrial Stockport after the death of their Victorian middle‐class proprietors whose wills were mostly concerned with providing a secure (possibly rentier income but also mobile and specialised capital) income for their offspring (Owens 2002); linked to lower co‐residence rates in present‐day southern Spanish regions. (Holdsworth et al.…”
Section: Population Density Regional Inheritance Practices and Farmementioning
confidence: 99%