The effects of obstacle proximity on aperture crossing behaviours

Abstract

Affordance theory and behavioural dynamics have been used as theoretical constructs to explain how individuals interact with the environment in order to avoid obstacles. Features of obstacle distance and multiple obstacle avoidance have been discussed in unique studies, yet the interactions of these environmental features have yet to be explored. The purpose of this study was to asses the effects of obstacle distance, relative to the goal, on aperture crossing strategies. Kinematics and gaze behaviours were assessed in a cohort of female young adults (N = 24, 21.3 ± 1.4 years). Results identified that participants chose to navigate through gaps of 1.3× shoulder width or greater, regardless of obstacle distance. However, safety margin in the anterior-posterior direction was found to increase with increased obstacle distance, suggesting unique environmental affordances for each obstacle distance. Therefore, although decision making on whether to navigate through, or around, the aperture appears to be unaffected by obstacle location, specific environmental features result in unique kinematic behaviours. Such behaviours fit within, and add merit to, the tenets of both affordance theory and behavioural dynamics.

Navigating Through a COVID-19 World: Avoiding Obstacles

“…Vision plays an important role in walking, from balance 4 , 5 to navigation 6 and obstacle crossing. 7 , 8 In fact, the lower visual field is particularly important for obstacle avoidance and foot clearance. 9 , 10 Blocking the lower visual field leads to larger downward head tilt, shorter steps, and slower gait speed.…”