2018
DOI: 10.5829/ije.2018.31.01a.08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Newmark Method Parameters on Errors in Dynamic Extended Finite Element Method Using Response Surface Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The negative characteristic of this method is reflected in the numerical extension of the period. It is described in more detail in (Bathe, 2014;Newmark, 1959;Jin et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2018;Wilson, 2001;Anahory Simoes et al, 2023;Karimi et al, 2018;Hassan, 2019). Solving system oscillation equations using the Newmark method by direct integration is shown by Algorithm 3.…”
Section: Newmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The negative characteristic of this method is reflected in the numerical extension of the period. It is described in more detail in (Bathe, 2014;Newmark, 1959;Jin et al, 2004;Liu et al, 2018;Wilson, 2001;Anahory Simoes et al, 2023;Karimi et al, 2018;Hassan, 2019). Solving system oscillation equations using the Newmark method by direct integration is shown by Algorithm 3.…”
Section: Newmark Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization was obtained using RSM with Minitab 18 software for getting optimum parameters of the print speed and layer height that are started by doing first-order tests. The RSM regression model is generally quadratic full equation or reduced form [42]. This test is calculated by the following mathematical Equation (2) (RSM equation):…”
Section: Printability and Optimization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%