2000
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.114.2.227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of neurotoxic hippocampal lesions on two effects of context after fear extinction.

Abstract: Three conditioned suppression experiments with rats examined the role of the hippocampus in 2 effects of context after extinction. Reinstatement is the context-specific recovery of fear to an extinguished conditioned stimulus (CS) that occurs following independent presentations of the unconditioned stimulus (US), after extinction. Renewal is the recovery of fear when the CS is presented in the context in which it was conditioned, after extinction in a different context. Results indicated that neurotoxic lesion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

15
149
6
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
15
149
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Contextual fear extinction was impaired in mice with a reduced HC (strain 9XCA/ Wah). Like fear conditioning, extinction has been proposed to be a form of new learning rather than an erasure of existing memories (for review, see Bouton, 1993), and it is dependent on hippocampal function (Wilson et al, 1995;Frohardt et al, 2000) (see also Fox and Holland, 1998). In addition, extinction is NMDA receptor dependent (Lee and Kim, 1998;Santini et al, 2001) (but see Berman and Dudai, 2001) and requires protein synthesis (Flood et al, 1977;Berman and Dudai, 2001;Vianna et al, 2001), similar to fear conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual fear extinction was impaired in mice with a reduced HC (strain 9XCA/ Wah). Like fear conditioning, extinction has been proposed to be a form of new learning rather than an erasure of existing memories (for review, see Bouton, 1993), and it is dependent on hippocampal function (Wilson et al, 1995;Frohardt et al, 2000) (see also Fox and Holland, 1998). In addition, extinction is NMDA receptor dependent (Lee and Kim, 1998;Santini et al, 2001) (but see Berman and Dudai, 2001) and requires protein synthesis (Flood et al, 1977;Berman and Dudai, 2001;Vianna et al, 2001), similar to fear conditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…110 Consistent with this general framework, reinstatement of extinguished fear, a context-specific phenomenon thought to be mediated primarily by context-US associations, is disrupted by pretraining radiofrequency lesions of fimbria-fornix 111 or pretraining electrolytic lesions of hippocampus. 112 Hippocampal involvement in renewal is more complex. Studies involving permanent, pretraining lesions of fimbria-fornix 111 or hippocampus 112,113 have reported inconsistent effects, but studies employing temporary inactivation of hippocampus via localized infusions of the GABA A receptor agonist muscimol have reported specific deficits.…”
Section: Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…112 Hippocampal involvement in renewal is more complex. Studies involving permanent, pretraining lesions of fimbria-fornix 111 or hippocampus 112,113 have reported inconsistent effects, but studies employing temporary inactivation of hippocampus via localized infusions of the GABA A receptor agonist muscimol have reported specific deficits. When animals are tested in a novel context (AAB or ABC renewal) and muscimol is infused into hippocampus before test, renewal is not observed (i.e., freezing is equally low in all contexts).…”
Section: Neural Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contextual information can resolve this ambiguity because rats trained in context A and extinguished in context B will display a renewed conditioned response if they are retested in context A (the ABA design) or another context C (the ABC design). Bouton and colleagues (Wilson et al 1995;Frohardt et al 2000) were the first to examine the contribution of the hippocampal formation to context-specific extinction. Using the ABA design, they found no evidence that relatively complete damage to the hippocampal formation disrupted context-specific extinction.…”
Section: Conditional Discrimination Type IImentioning
confidence: 99%