2014
DOI: 10.1080/09735070.2014.11917640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Nepotism, Cronyism and Political Favoritism on the Doctors Working in Public Hospitals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, lobbying powerful political intermediaries could be used by health workers to reverse a decision they deemed unfavourable [37]. Karakose's study in Turkey interviewed doctors on their views on favouritism and reported that unfairness in appointing managers based on their political and ideological views was common [38]. La Forgia et al's qualitative study on the Dominican Republic stated that patronage was a key factor in the appointment and deployment of health staff, with recommendations from politicians, political parties, military officials and top governmental officials influencing decisions [39].…”
Section: Patronage and Clientelismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, lobbying powerful political intermediaries could be used by health workers to reverse a decision they deemed unfavourable [37]. Karakose's study in Turkey interviewed doctors on their views on favouritism and reported that unfairness in appointing managers based on their political and ideological views was common [38]. La Forgia et al's qualitative study on the Dominican Republic stated that patronage was a key factor in the appointment and deployment of health staff, with recommendations from politicians, political parties, military officials and top governmental officials influencing decisions [39].…”
Section: Patronage and Clientelismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sometimes resulted in the recruitment of persons who displayed signs of incompetency. Karakose's enquiry into Turkish doctors' views on favouritism reported that prioritising friendship relationships in decisionmaking was a common practice potentially resulting in perceptions of unfairness and concomitant dissatisfaction of health workers [38]. Similarly, in Uganda, Carmago reported that personal connections were an important factor in the recruitment and promotion of health staff and that promotion was dependent on continued demonstration of loyalty to the appointing patron by participating in other corrupt acts such as demanding informal payments (bribery) and embezzlement [43].…”
Section: Nepotism and Cronyismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Gjinovci (2016), nepotism refers to hiring relations irrespective of their abilities and eventually lead to detrimental consequences for both the organization and the economy. Moreover, when an individual is favored in the organization due to family associations rather than based on his or her capabilities lead to low individual performance and team spirit (Karakose, 2014). In addition, nepotism signifies a threat to the position of the organization due to the nepotistic selection of personnel irrespective of who has been more capable amongst the candidates lead to creating perilous influence on the performance of job (Singh & Twalo, 2014).…”
Section: Nepotism Employee Performance and Hrm Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary problem during execution of HRM is the factor of organization politics i.e., favoritism & nepotism lead to affect the whole process of implementation of HR practices such as recruitment & promotions as well as employee performance, satisfaction & commitment in the public sector of Pakistan (Aslam, Arfeen, Mohti, & Rahman, 2015;Bilal, Rafi, & Khalid, 2017;Muqadas, Rehman, & Aslam, 2017). Karakose (2014) emphasized that unfairness in appointing individuals based on favoritism from the political aspect of the organization ultimately affect the sense of fairness among employees. Favoritism and nepotism lead to creating a political environment within the organization to hold down competition for the higher positions and hinder the career progress of high performers can affect the employee and organizational performance adversely (Safina, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-Study by Karakose (2014) ISSN 1948-5433 2016 using Semi structured interviews with the participants. The results showed that favoritism from the point of view of the participants pertains to unethical behaviors.…”
Section: -Study Bymentioning
confidence: 99%