2016
DOI: 10.1111/famp.12267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Mother Participation in Relationship Education on Coparenting, Parenting, and Child Social Competence: Modeling Spillover Effects for Low‐Income Minority Preschool Children

Abstract: Although suggestions are that benefits of relationship and marriage education (RME) participation extend from the interparental relationship with parenting and child outcomes, few evaluation studies of RME test these assumptions and the relationship among changes in these areas. This quasi-experimental study focuses on a parallel process growth model that tests a spillover hypothesis of program effects and finds, in a sample of low-income minority mothers with a child attending a Head Start program, that incre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there are decades of research and several meta-analyses that explore the change in relationship quality indicators following CRE, very limited research has answered the call to expand outcome assessment areas and to begin more exploration of the processes of change following CRE (Markman & Rhoades, 2012). A few studies have tested the influence among outcome variables theoretically and analytically (i.e., finding the best fitting model) using data collected concurrently (e.g., Bradford et al, 2014;Rauer et al, 2014); however, the current study joins only a few previous CRE studies ( Adler-Baeder et al, 2018;Doss et al, 2020;Zemp et al, 2017) and explored how changes in one area at one time point influences change in another area at a later time point. Further, we built on the one previous study that considered the link between change in individual mental health indicators and couple functioning after participating in a CRE program and used concurrent assessments (Bradford et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…While there are decades of research and several meta-analyses that explore the change in relationship quality indicators following CRE, very limited research has answered the call to expand outcome assessment areas and to begin more exploration of the processes of change following CRE (Markman & Rhoades, 2012). A few studies have tested the influence among outcome variables theoretically and analytically (i.e., finding the best fitting model) using data collected concurrently (e.g., Bradford et al, 2014;Rauer et al, 2014); however, the current study joins only a few previous CRE studies ( Adler-Baeder et al, 2018;Doss et al, 2020;Zemp et al, 2017) and explored how changes in one area at one time point influences change in another area at a later time point. Further, we built on the one previous study that considered the link between change in individual mental health indicators and couple functioning after participating in a CRE program and used concurrent assessments (Bradford et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we built on the one previous study that considered the link between change in individual mental health indicators and couple functioning after participating in a CRE program and used concurrent assessments (Bradford et al, 2014). The current study utilized a more comprehensive measure of individual mental health functioning and couple relationship functioning and longitudinal data to prospectively examine the influence of individual mental health indicators on later couple functioning indicators in an effort to replicate the Bradford and colleagues’ finding and then tested the cross‐lagged associations between changes in individual mental health functioning and couple relationship functioning over time, providing a more accurate test of the comparative “spillover” process (Adler‐Baeder et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations