The 2018 Conference on Artificial Life 2018
DOI: 10.1162/isal_a_00111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of morphology and fitness on catastrophic interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to [22], we optimize both controllers for all experimented fixed morphologies (see Figure 5) jointly. Inspired by [45], we use the minimum performance among all morphologies as the fitness values for the controllers. 10 trials for each type of controller, initialized with different random seeds, are evolved for 5000 generations.…”
Section: Optimization On Multiple Fixed Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to [22], we optimize both controllers for all experimented fixed morphologies (see Figure 5) jointly. Inspired by [45], we use the minimum performance among all morphologies as the fitness values for the controllers. 10 trials for each type of controller, initialized with different random seeds, are evolved for 5000 generations.…”
Section: Optimization On Multiple Fixed Morphologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multitask setting, Powers et al [23] recently demonstrated that certain body plans suffer catastrophic forgetting, while others do not. It was hypothesized that a robot with the right morphology could in some cases alias separate tasks: certain designs are able to move in such a way that a seemingly different training instance converges sensorially to a familiar instance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolved robots have been transferred to reality (Ruud et al, 2016) although the reality gap remains a persistent issue (Stanton, 2018;Koos et al, 2010;Jakobi, 1998). While enhancing performance of systems is often the primary goal, one outstanding area is quantifying the impact that different components of a robotic system (Powers et al, 2018), or the underlying evolutionary algorithm (Dolson and Ofria, 2018), have on evolved systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%