1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf01173313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effects of mood variation on state-dependent retention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If this hypothesis is correct, it seriously restricts MDR to a special population of people and social situations and undermines the basis for general interest in it. But this "hypnotic skill" hypothesis does not explain the other positive demonstrations of MDR, such as those by B. Thompson (cited in Bower, 1981), by Bartlett et al (1982), and by Schare, Lisman, and Spear (1984). Accordingly, we are at a loss to explain the discrepancies among all these findings.…”
Section: Conflicting Evidence For Mood-dependent Retrievalcontrasting
confidence: 39%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If this hypothesis is correct, it seriously restricts MDR to a special population of people and social situations and undermines the basis for general interest in it. But this "hypnotic skill" hypothesis does not explain the other positive demonstrations of MDR, such as those by B. Thompson (cited in Bower, 1981), by Bartlett et al (1982), and by Schare, Lisman, and Spear (1984). Accordingly, we are at a loss to explain the discrepancies among all these findings.…”
Section: Conflicting Evidence For Mood-dependent Retrievalcontrasting
confidence: 39%
“…MDR for the two-list interference design was later reported by Bartlett, Burleson, and Santrock (1982), by Schare, Lisman, and Spear (1984), and by Goerss and Miller (1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More relevant to the present study, similar emotional states (i.e., internal environment) at learning and retrieval can also have advantageous effects on memory accuracy, otherwise known as mood state-dependent memory (e.g., Bower, Monteiro, & Gilligan, 1978;Schare, Lisman, & Spear, 1984). In other words, material learned in a particular mood will be recalled more easily when that mood is reinstated at retrieval, regardless of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the material itself (Baddeley, 1990).…”
Section: Interviewer's Effect On Witness Memory -Working Alliance Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. Eich, Weingartner, Stillman, & Gillin, 1975), contextual factors (in this case, mood) serve as discriminatory cues such that when learning and recall Contexts match, retrieval is facilitated, and when the two contexts differ, retrieval is inhibited. Several studies have indicated, although the effect is not always obtained, that mood can act as such a contextual cue in learning and recall (Bower, Monteiro,& Gilligan, 1978;Schare,Lisman, & Spear, 1984).…”
Section: Mismatch In Affectivecontextmentioning
confidence: 99%